webos tagged 1.6.1
> From: shazron@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:11:08 0700
> Subject: Re: 1.6.1
> To: callbackdev@incubator.apache.org
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB496
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sigh  user reported iOS bug
> > http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8907
> > (you know who you are ;)
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too.
> >>
> >> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in
> >> two hours haha
> >>
> >> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE
> >>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed
> >>>all the bugs I sawS
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Android is tagged.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Done
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any
> >>>> > > > complaints.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordovajs tag
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and
> >>>>tag
> >>>> > JS
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse  he has commits to cordovajs
> >>>> > coming,
> >>>> > > > > >once those are in we can retag cordovajs to 1.6.1
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
> >>>> > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser
> >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the
> >>>> > history.
> >>>> > > > We
> >>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that
> >>>> > would
> >>>> > > be
> >>>> > > > > >>>more
> >>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do
> >>>> this
> >>>> > > next
> >>>> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it.
> >>>> > > > > >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordovajs (somehow), it
> >>>> > should
> >>>> > > be
> >>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordovaios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as
> >>>>1.6.0.
> >>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the
> >>>> common
> >>>> > js
> >>>> > > > > >>>>API, and
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing
> >>>>out
> >>>> > for
> >>>> > > > > >>>>1.7?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression
> >>>> that
> >>>> > > iOS
> >>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordovajs commits to add to 1.6.1?
> >>>> Although
> >>>> > > > > >>>>nothing
> >>>> > > > > >>>> that
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie,
> >>>>all
> >>>> in
> >>>> > > my
> >>>> > > > > >>>> platform
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early
> >>>> > anyways..
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron
> >>>><shazron@gmail.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No  it's about a user's contribution being noted (it
> >>>> > > exists), I
> >>>> > > > > >>>>will
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post1.6.1 (I
> >>>>acknowledge
> >>>> my
> >>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off
> >>>>1.6.0
> >>>> > then
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherrypick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser <
> >>>> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in
> >>>>the
> >>>> > > common
> >>>> > > > > >>>>JS,
> >>>> > > > > >>>> even
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron <
> >>>> > shazron@gmail.com
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <
> >>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and
> >>>> get
> >>>> > > this
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
> >>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOSspecific parameters (like
> >>>>allow
> >>>> > edit
> >>>> > > > and
> >>>> > > > > >>>>those
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordovajs, so yeah, we left
> >>>>them
> >>>> in
> >>>> > > > there
> >>>> > > > > >>>>as we
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without
> >>>>needing
> >>>> an
> >>>> > > API
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs
> >>>>need to
> >>>> > > > > >>>>updated too.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long
> >>>>and
> >>>> > > > > >>>>difficult
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform
> >>>>we
> >>>> > add
> >>>> > > > > >>>>support
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS
> >>>> > parameters
> >>>> > > > > >>>>ones
> >>>> > > > > >>>> that
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't
> >>>>know
> >>>> > how
> >>>> > > we
> >>>> > > > > >>>>merge
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking
> >>>>those
> >>>> out
> >>>> > > > will
> >>>> > > > > >>>>break
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is
> >>>>the
> >>>> > way
> >>>> > > > to
> >>>> > > > > >>>>go as
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy .
> >>>> > We
> >>>> > > > can
> >>>> > > > > >>>> remove
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in
> >>>> > somehow.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
> >>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't
> >>>>belong
> >>>> > in
> >>>> > > > the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> common
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole
> >>>>point
> >>>> of
> >>>> > > > > >>>>cordovajs
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to
> >>>>add
> >>>> > this
> >>>> > > > to
> >>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
> >>>> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
> >>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
> >>>> > shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the
> >>>>cordovajs? I
> >>>> > can
> >>>> > > > > >>>>branch
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherrypick your latest commit for 1.6.1
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj
> >>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs
> >>>>for
> >>>> > this.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
> >>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like
> >>>> it's
> >>>> > > > > >>>>intended
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be
> >>>>in
> >>>> > > 1.6.1.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip
> >>>>Maj <
> >>>> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that
> >>>> myself.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOSonly param..
> >>>>sigh.
> >>>> > We
> >>>> > > > > >>>>gotta
> >>>> > > > > >>>> stop
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update
> >>>> documentation.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> >>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param
> >>>> for
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip
> >>>> Maj
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1  the build task in
> >>>>the
> >>>> > JS
> >>>> > > > > >>>>should
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake
> >>>> > tasks
> >>>> > > in
> >>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th
> >>>> "async"
> >>>> > > > > >>>>parameter
> >>>> > > > > >>>> to
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call
> >>>>complete()
> >>>> > > when
> >>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/introtojake/asyncjakefile.jsfor
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> >>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordovajs is
> >>>>tagged
> >>>> > > > 1.6.1.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
> >>>>Anis
> >>>> > > KADRI
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1
> >>>> > before
> >>>> > > > > >>>>end of
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM,
> >>>> > Shazron
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version
> >>>>tag
> >>>> > as
> >>>> > > > > >>>>well in
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29
> >>>>PM,
> >>>> > > Shazron
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was
> >>>> > > released,
> >>>> > > > > >>>>I'm
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release"
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and
> >>>>move
> >>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26
> >>>>PM,
> >>>> > > Filip
> >>>> > > > > >>>>Maj
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too.
> >>>> Since
> >>>> > > > > >>>>adding the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default
> >>>> task
> >>>> > > > isn't
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake
> >>>> build"
> >>>> > > and
> >>>> > > > > >>>>"jake
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own  gonna try to figure it
> >>>> out.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM,
> >>>>"Shazron" <
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS
> >>>> has a
> >>>> > > few
> >>>> > > > > >>>> commits
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordovajs) as well. Aim for
> >>>> > first
> >>>> > > > > >>>>thing
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17
> >>>> PM,
> >>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been
> >>>>discovered
> >>>> in
> >>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > bug
> >>>> > > > > >>>>on the
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment13252809
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to
> >>>>just
> >>>> > > > > >>>>repackage
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know
> >>>>if
> >>>> > > people
> >>>> > > > > >>>>are
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also
> >>>>had
> >>>> > some
> >>>> > > > > >>>>major
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
> >>>> release.
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Steve
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>
