incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: 1.6.1
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:05:29 GMT
Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too.

Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in
two hours haha

On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:

>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE
>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed
>all the bugs I saw.
>
>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Android is tagged.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Done
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any
>> > > > complaints.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and
>>tag
>> > JS
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js
>> > coming,
>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser
>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify
the
>> > history.
>> > > >  We
>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead,
since that
>> > would
>> > > be
>> > > > > >>>more
>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say
"don't do
>> this
>> > > next
>> > > > > >>> time".   I'm not that invested in it.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js
(somehow), it
>> > should
>> > > be
>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the
same as
>>1.6.0.
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit
that changed the
>> common
>> > js
>> > > > > >>>>API, and
>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure
this one thing
>>out
>> > for
>> > > > > >>>>1.7?
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under
the impression
>> that
>> > > iOS
>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite
confused.
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits
to add to 1.6.1?
>> Although
>> > > > > >>>>nothing
>> > > > > >>>> that
>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built
for wp7. ( ie,
>>all
>> in
>> > > my
>> > > > > >>>> platform
>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1
too early
>> > anyways..
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron
>><shazron@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution
being noted (it
>> > > exists), I
>> > > > > >>>>will
>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code
post-1.6.1 (I
>>acknowledge
>> my
>> > > > > >>>>mistake in
>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place).
Can we branch off
>>1.6.0
>> > then
>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for
1.6.1?
>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM,
Joe Bowser <
>> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that
we leave the thing in
>>the
>> > > common
>> > > > > >>>>JS,
>> > > > > >>>> even
>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to
be there.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45
PM, Shazron <
>> > shazron@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that
commit? Then, no.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <
>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase
the head, push this out and
>> get
>> > > this
>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012
at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those
iOS-specific parameters (like
>>allow
>> > edit
>> > > > and
>> > > > > >>>>those
>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior
to cordova-js, so yeah, we left
>>them
>> in
>> > > > there
>> > > > > >>>>as we
>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove
without deprecation.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal
with the iOS issue without
>>needing
>> an
>> > > API
>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not,
leave it in there, but docs
>>need to
>> > > > > >>>>updated too.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and
changing the public API is a long
>>and
>> > > > > >>>>difficult
>> > > > > >>>> >>>process
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only
get tougher with every platform
>>we
>> > add
>> > > > > >>>>support
>> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37
PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have
to scrap the other three(?) iOS
>> > parameters
>> > > > > >>>>ones
>> > > > > >>>> that
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist
in common if you noticed. Don't
>>know
>> > how
>> > > we
>> > > > > >>>>merge
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?)
this one properly because taking
>>those
>> out
>> > > > will
>> > > > > >>>>break
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone
that is using it, but a deprecation is
>>the
>> > way
>> > > > to
>> > > > > >>>>go as
>> > > > > >>>> >>>per
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy .
>> > We
>> > > > can
>> > > > > >>>> remove
>> > > > > >>>> >>> this
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit
and I'll find a way to get this in
>> > somehow.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr
12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The
problem is that this parameter doesn't
>>belong
>> > in
>> > > > the
>> > > > > >>>> common
>> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just
ignored in Android, but the whole
>>point
>> of
>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js
>> > > > > >>>> >>>is
>> > > > > >>>> >>> so
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's
common.  It'd look pretty screwed up to
>>add
>> > this
>> > > > to
>> > > > > >>>>the
>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu,
Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
>> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> so what's the point of this new parameter?
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
>> > shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>I did. Do we want to revert the
>>cordova-js? I
>> > can
>> > > > > >>>>branch
>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>> > > > > >>>> >>> and
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj
>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs
>>for
>> > this.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> Shaz can you comment?
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like
>> it's
>> > > > > >>>>intended
>> > > > > >>>> >>>for
>> > > > > >>>> >>> both
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
Android
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be
>>in
>> > > 1.6.1.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip
>>Maj <
>> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> I was actually just looking at that
>> myself.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param..
>>sigh.
>> > We
>> > > > > >>>>gotta
>> > > > > >>>> stop
>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> especially if we don't update
>> documentation.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param
>> for
>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet?
 I
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >didn't
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >notice that change until now.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip
>> Maj
>> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in
>>the
>> > JS
>> > > > > >>>>should
>> > > > > >>>> >>>work
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>now.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake
>> > tasks
>> > > in
>> > > > > >>>>the
>> > > > > >>>> >>>future
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>them
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th
>> "async"
>> > > > > >>>>parameter
>> > > > > >>>> to
>> > > > > >>>> >>> the
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>function
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> and set it to true, and call
>>complete()
>> > > when
>> > > > > >>>>the
>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> See
>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> example.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is
>>tagged
>> > > > 1.6.1.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
>>Anis
>> > > KADRI
>> > > > <
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1
>> > before
>> > > > > >>>>end of
>> > > > > >>>> >>>day
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>some
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM,
>> > Shazron
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version
>>tag
>> > as
>> > > > > >>>>well in
>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29
>>PM,
>> > > Shazron
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was
>> > > released,
>> > > > > >>>>I'm
>> > > > > >>>> >>>going
>> > > > > >>>> >>> to
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>"Release"
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>the
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and
>>move
>> > > > > >>>>outstanding
>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>version
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > tag.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26
>>PM,
>> > > Filip
>> > > > > >>>>Maj
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too.
>> Since
>> > > > > >>>>adding the
>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>the
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> packaging
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default
>> task
>> > > > isn't
>> > > > > >>>> >>>running
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake
>> build"
>> > > and
>> > > > > >>>>"jake
>> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>"jake" on
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> its
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it
>> out.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM,
>>"Shazron" <
>> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.  iOS
>> has a
>> > > few
>> > > > > >>>> commits
>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>in
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for
>> > first
>> > > > > >>>>thing
>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>to
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17
>> PM,
>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been
>>discovered
>> in
>> > > > > >>>>Cordova
>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>requires
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>a
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>new
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > tag
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out
>> the
>> > > bug
>> > > > > >>>>on the
>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>at
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>co
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to
>>just
>> > > > > >>>>repackage
>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>bug
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>fixed as
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > we
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know
>>if
>> > > people
>> > > > > >>>>are
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>or
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>not.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also
>>had
>> > some
>> > > > > >>>>major
>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which
he
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>has
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>fixed
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> now
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
>> release.
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>> > > > > >>>> >
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>


Mime
View raw message