incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:55:25 GMT
Here's the commit Joe

http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-mobile-spec.git;
a=commit;h=0e412704adc642248ce60a57db5d6e6c04d1951a


On 4/11/12 8:47 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

>I don't think Automation would have helped. I grabbed the js that was on
>the cordova-js 1.6 tag, which is apparently broken.  The only difference
>is
>that a script would have failed and not me.  We still need to coordinate
>releases better.
>
>BTW where was the test that should have failed for seekTo?
>On Apr 11, 2012 8:16 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I had to retag Android to 1.6.0. The .js file that Joe added into repo
>>did
>> not have the fix for FileWriter.seek().
>>
>> We really need to make this step part of the packaging of the release.
>>If
>> we had a script that builds all the deliverables and then we go off and
>> test them would be better than all of us doing our ad hoc builds.
>>
>> Simon Mac Donald
>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Retagged Android 1.6.0
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0
>> > >
>> > > On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js
>> (and
>> > > >also a test into mobile spec) today.
>> > > >
>> > > >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we
>>generally
>> > had
>> > > >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of
>> line.
>> > > >
>> > > >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That
>> certainly
>> > > >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in.
>> Gord
>> > > >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine.
>> > > >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2.
>> > > >
>> > > >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on!
>> > > >
>> > > >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least
>> > failing
>> > > >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing.  What I do care
>> about
>> > is
>> > > >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple
>> Android
>> > > >>devices.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures
>> > > >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures
>> > > >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures
>> > > >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures
>> > > >>
>> > > >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing
>>them,
>> > and
>> > > >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out.  I'm OK with
>> > tagging
>> > > >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm
>> > > >>wondering
>> > > >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed
>>in
>> > the
>> > > >>JS
>> > > >>earlier.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the
>> contact
>> > > >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II.
 Testing
>> > > >>>appears to
>> > > >>> >be completely inconsistent.  I'm going to factory reset
the
>>Galaxy
>> > > >>>Nexus
>> > > >>> >and see if I get the same results.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser
>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread.  The thing
is
>>that on
>> > my
>> > > >>> >>Galaxy
>> > > >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures.
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a
contact, but
>> only a
>> > > >>> >>>couple
>> > > >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip
(heavy)
>>test
>> > that
>> > > >>> >>>saves,
>> > > >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes..
So.. Not
>>sure.
>> > > >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because
that's what most
>> people
>> > > >>> >>>have.  I
>> > > >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for
us to release,
>>IMO.
>> >  Why
>> > > >>> >>>did it
>> > > >>> >>> >jump up like that?
>> > > >>> >>> >
>> > > >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >
>> > > >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js
+ framework commit
>>on
>> > > >>>Android.
>> > > >>> >>>21
>> > > >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus.
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is
good to go, Jesse
>>says
>> > the
>> > > >>> >>>same
>> > > >>> >>> >>for
>> > > >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good.
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the
docs with a 1.6.0
>> > > >>>directory,
>> > > >>> >>> then
>> > > >>> >>> >> tag the docs.
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new
in cordova-js, we are
>> just
>> > > >>> >>>picking
>> > > >>> >>> a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming
all of us have
>>been
>> > > >>>working
>> > > >>> >>> >>with
>> > > >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms,
we are not
>> > introducing
>> > > >>> >>> anything
>> > > >>> >>> >> >new.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer
touches the common
>>code in
>> > > >>> >>>cordova-js
>> > > >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across
all platforms. We
>>have to
>> > > >>>stop
>> > > >>> >>> >>working
>> > > >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that
is not in the spirit of
>> this
>> > > >>> >>>project.
>> > > >>> >>> >>We
>> > > >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any
of us need to be
>> comfortable
>> > > >>> >>>testing
>> > > >>> >>> >>on
>> > > >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser"
<bowserj@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes
somehow break Android,
>> what
>> > > >>> >>>happens?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04
AM, Jesse MacFadyen
>> > > >>> >>> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> None.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>  Jesse
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00
AM, Shazron
>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> > None
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag
it 1.6.0.. Objections?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50
AM, "Joe Bowser"
>><bowserj@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going
to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr
10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj
>> > > >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already
notes in docs. Durrr.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12
10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ
actually Compass is not available in
>> > BlackBerry
>> > > >>> >>>before
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would
explain why it's not working on 6.0 :)
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm
going to file an issue for that in JIRA.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm
going to update the docs to note this, and
>> then,
>> > > >>>we
>> > > >>> >>> >>should be
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> good
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag,
ya?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On
4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj"
>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The
>> accel
>> > > >>> >>>callback
>> > > >>> >>> >>test
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
but when I run the manual tests for accel they
>> all
>> > > >>>check
>> > > >>> >>> >>out, so
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
failing tests might be a little blown up.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
The file API looks fine, Drew.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed.
>> The
>> > > >>>manual
>> > > >>> >>> >>tests
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>for
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
Compass keep returning "[object object]" so
>>there
>> > > >>>seems
>> > > >>> >>>to
>> > > >>> >>> >>be a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> little
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are
>> looking
>> > > >>>into
>> > > >>> >>> that.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're
>>good to
>> > > >>>tag. We
>> > > >>> >>> >>pass
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>on
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj"
>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
No worries Jesse.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try
>>to
>> > > >>> >>>reproduce +
>> > > >>> >>> >>fix
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>what
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
you're
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
seeing, Drew.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my
>> rush
>> > to
>> > > >>> >>>have a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>long
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
weekend.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sorry all.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Cheers,
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
 Jesse
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone5
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser
>> > > >>> >>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll
>> put
>> > it
>> > > >>> >>>back
>> > > >>> >>> >>when
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>we
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
this
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
sorted out!
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew
>>Walters
>> <
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> deedubbu@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
I'm still testing on other versions of BB.
>> > > >>>Seeing
>> > > >>> >>>some
>> > > >>> >>> >>odd
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not
>> sure
>> > if
>> > > >>>it
>> > > >>> >>>is
>> > > >>> >>> >>my
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>test
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
or
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
real bug.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian
>> LeRoux
>> > > >>> >>> >><b@brian.io>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
+1
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj
>>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
OK so I pulled the latest master from
>> > > >>>cordova-js
>> > > >>> >>>and
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> integrated
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
latest master for blackberry-webworks.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests
>> > > >>>failing.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the
>>rest
>> in
>> > > >>>1.7.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <
>> > fil@adobe.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>> >>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Agree with leaving the RC tags alone.
>>Just
>> > > >>>have to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
IMO
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron"
>> > > >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >>wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's wait until BB is done and do a
>>tag
>> > > >>>reset
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>discussion?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
steps
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
take
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc1 should still be there though
>>I
>> > think
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip
>> Maj
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm in the process of testing the
>>latest
>> > BB
>> > > >>> >>>code so
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>I'll
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> let
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
guys
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
know
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
soon how we're looking there.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is that the last thing need before
>>we're
>> > all
>> > > >>> >>>good
>> > > >>> >>> to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>tag
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
release?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should delete all the
>>1.6.0
>> > > >>>tags. We
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>haven't
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
released
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
any
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there
>> > > >>>shouldn't
>> > > >>> >>>be a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>problem
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
that.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So I agree with Fil's steps.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Simon Mac Donald
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM,
>>Filip
>> > Maj
>> > > >>><
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> fil@adobe.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I like the general process Joe lays
>> out.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm not sure how vendoring-in a
>>tagged
>> > > >>> >>>cordova.js
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>file is
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
error
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
prone
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
though, Bryce. Is it just the
>>manual
>> > > >>>process
>> > > >>> >>>of
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>checking
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
tag in
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova-js, building, and copying
>>the
>> > file
>> > > >>> >>>over
>> > > >>> >>> to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
implementation? If this is the
>>concern
>> > > >>>then
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>certainly,
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tool
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
should be set up to do that
>> > automatically.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For some reason 1.6.0 tag in
>> cordova-js
>> > > >>>was
>> > > >>> >>>added
>> > > >>> >>> >>4
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>days
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago,
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
but
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc2
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure
>>what
>> > > >>>happened
>> > > >>> >>> >>there.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In light of the tags not being
>>ordered
>> > > >>> >>>properly
>> > > >>> >>> >>and
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
creeping in, I propose, just for
>>the
>> > 1.6.0
>> > > >>> >>> >>release,
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>that
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in
>> > cordova-js.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the
>> latest
>> > > >>>commit
>> > > >>> >>> >>(that
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
file
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek bug fix) - now our tags are at
>> > least
>> > > >>>in
>> > > >>> >>>the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>right
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
3) rebuild, reintegrate into
>>platforms
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
4) unfortunately, retag the
>>platform
>> > > >>> >>> >>implementations
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If retagging is too unholy then f
>>it,
>> I
>> > > >>>say we
>> > > >>> >>> tag
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
1.6.1.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis"
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Joe eluded to, checking
>>cordova-js
>> > > >>>into
>> > > >>> >>>the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>various
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
repositories holds up the release.
>>  It
>> > is
>> > > >>> >>>also
>> > > >>> >>> >>error
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone
-
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
not
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
mention pushing to each repository
>> > every
>> > > >>>time
>> > > >>> >>> >>there
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>is a
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
change
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
takes
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a lot of time & can get out of of
>> sync.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts on having the release
>> > build
>> > > >>> >>>script
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>handle
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this?
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
far
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
as during normal development and
>> > testing,
>> > > >>>we
>> > > >>> >>>are
>> > > >>> >>> >>all
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
building
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova.js anyway, and keep
>>current
>> in
>> > > >>>our
>> > > >>> >>>own
>> > > >>> >>> >>ways.
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM,
>> Simon
>> > > >>> >>>MacDonald
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I just fixed what seems to be a
>>zero
>> > day
>> > > >>> >>>bug in
>> > > >>> >>> >>our
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
implementation
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
of
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
FileWriter. If possible it would
>>be
>> > good
>> > > >>>to
>> > > >>> >>>get
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>this
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> bug
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
fix
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
into
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
all
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
>> > > >>> >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>


Mime
View raw message