incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:37:55 GMT
Let's modify it inside the webworks repo for now, and create a release
checklist for webworks + note that in the release process wiki article [1]
(bottom of page).

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/CuttingReleases


On 4/10/12 1:40 PM, "Drew Walters" <deedubbu@gmail.com> wrote:

>One thing I just remembered which is a gotcha with cordova-js.  The
>version for Playbook comes from the cordova-js
>lib/playbook/plugin/playbook/manager.js file.  So in order to update
>Playbook version to 1.6.0 (its currently 1.6.0rc2) then cordova-js
>would need updated.
>
>Alternatively, I can just modify the file in the blackberry repo which
>was copied from cordova-js.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>2012/4/10 Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>:
>> Should I tag blackberry or Drew, you got that?
>>
>> On 4/10/12 1:27 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Retagged Android 1.6.0
>>>
>>>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0
>>>>
>>>> On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js
>>>>(and
>>>> >also a test into mobile spec) today.
>>>> >
>>>> >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we
>>>>generally
>>>>had
>>>> >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of
>>>>line.
>>>> >
>>>> >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That
>>>>certainly
>>>> >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in.
>>>>Gord
>>>> >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine.
>>>> >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2.
>>>> >
>>>> >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on!
>>>> >
>>>> >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least
>>>>failing
>>>> >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing.  What I do care
>>>>about is
>>>> >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple
>>>>Android
>>>> >>devices.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures
>>>> >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures
>>>> >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures
>>>> >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures
>>>> >>
>>>> >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them,
>>>>and
>>>> >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out.  I'm OK with
>>>>tagging
>>>> >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm
>>>> >>wondering
>>>> >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed
in
>>>>the
>>>> >>JS
>>>> >>earlier.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the
>>>>contact
>>>> >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II. 
Testing
>>>> >>>appears to
>>>> >>> >be completely inconsistent.  I'm going to factory reset
the
>>>>Galaxy
>>>> >>>Nexus
>>>> >>> >and see if I get the same results.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread.  The thing
is that
>>>>on
>>>>my
>>>> >>> >>Galaxy
>>>> >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact,
but
>>>>only
>>>>a
>>>> >>> >>>couple
>>>> >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip
(heavy) test
>>>>that
>>>> >>> >>>saves,
>>>> >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes..
So.. Not sure.
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's
what most
>>>>people
>>>> >>> >>>have.  I
>>>> >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us
to release, IMO.
>>>>Why
>>>> >>> >>>did it
>>>> >>> >>> >jump up like that?
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js +
framework commit on
>>>> >>>Android.
>>>> >>> >>>21
>>>> >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus.
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is
good to go, Jesse
>>>>says
>>>>the
>>>> >>> >>>same
>>>> >>> >>> >>for
>>>> >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good.
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the
docs with a 1.6.0
>>>> >>>directory,
>>>> >>> >>> then
>>>> >>> >>> >> tag the docs.
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new
in cordova-js, we are
>>>>just
>>>> >>> >>>picking
>>>> >>> >>> a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming
all of us have
>>>>been
>>>> >>>working
>>>> >>> >>> >>with
>>>> >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms,
we are not
>>>>introducing
>>>> >>> >>> anything
>>>> >>> >>> >> >new.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches
the common code
>>>>in
>>>> >>> >>>cordova-js
>>>> >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across
all platforms. We have
>>>>to
>>>> >>>stop
>>>> >>> >>> >>working
>>>> >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is
not in the spirit of
>>>>this
>>>> >>> >>>project.
>>>> >>> >>> >>We
>>>> >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of
us need to be
>>>>comfortable
>>>> >>> >>>testing
>>>> >>> >>> >>on
>>>> >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser"
<bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes
somehow break Android,
>>>>what
>>>> >>> >>>happens?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04
AM, Jesse MacFadyen
>>>> >>> >>> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> None.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers,
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>  Jesse
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM,
Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> > None
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag
it 1.6.0.. Objections?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50
AM, "Joe Bowser"
>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going
to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr
10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj
>>>> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already
notes in docs. Durrr.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12
10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ
actually Compass is not available in
>>>>BlackBerry
>>>> >>> >>>before
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would
explain why it's not working on 6.0 :)
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm
going to file an issue for that in JIRA.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm
going to update the docs to note this, and
>>>>then,
>>>> >>>we
>>>> >>> >>> >>should be
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> good
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag,
ya?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12
10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The
>>>>accel
>>>> >>> >>>callback
>>>> >>> >>> >>test
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
but when I run the manual tests for accel they
>>>>all
>>>> >>>check
>>>> >>> >>> >>out, so
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
failing tests might be a little blown up.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
The file API looks fine, Drew.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed.
>>>>The
>>>> >>>manual
>>>> >>> >>> >>tests
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>for
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
Compass keep returning "[object object]" so
>>>>there
>>>> >>>seems
>>>> >>> >>>to
>>>> >>> >>> >>be a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> little
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are
>>>>looking
>>>> >>>into
>>>> >>> >>> that.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good
>>>>to
>>>> >>>tag. We
>>>> >>> >>> >>pass
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>on
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
No worries Jesse.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to
>>>> >>> >>>reproduce +
>>>> >>> >>> >>fix
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>what
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
you're
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
seeing, Drew.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my
>>>>rush to
>>>> >>> >>>have a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>long
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
weekend.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sorry all.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Cheers,
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
 Jesse
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone5
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser
>>>> >>> >>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll
>>>>put it
>>>> >>> >>>back
>>>> >>> >>> >>when
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>we
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
this
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
sorted out!
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew
>>>>Walters <
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> deedubbu@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
I'm still testing on other versions of BB.
>>>> >>>Seeing
>>>> >>> >>>some
>>>> >>> >>> >>odd
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not
>>>>sure if
>>>> >>>it
>>>> >>> >>>is
>>>> >>> >>> >>my
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>test
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
or
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
real bug.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian
>>>>LeRoux
>>>> >>> >>> >><b@brian.io>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
+1
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
OK so I pulled the latest master from
>>>> >>>cordova-js
>>>> >>> >>>and
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> integrated
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
latest master for blackberry-webworks.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests
>>>> >>>failing.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest
>>>>in
>>>> >>>1.7.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj"
>>>><fil@adobe.com
>>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Agree with leaving the RC tags alone.
>>>>Just
>>>> >>>have to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
IMO
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron"
>>>> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag
>>>> >>>reset
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>discussion?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
steps
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
take
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I
>>>>think
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip
>>>>Maj
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm in the process of testing the
>>>>latest
>>>>BB
>>>> >>> >>>code so
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>I'll
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> let
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
guys
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
know
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
soon how we're looking there.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is that the last thing need before
>>>>we're
>>>>all
>>>> >>> >>>good
>>>> >>> >>> to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>tag
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
release?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should delete all the 1.6.0
>>>> >>>tags. We
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>haven't
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
released
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
any
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there
>>>> >>>shouldn't
>>>> >>> >>>be a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>problem
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
that.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So I agree with Fil's steps.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Simon Mac Donald
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM,
>>>>Filip
>>>>Maj
>>>> >>><
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> fil@adobe.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I like the general process Joe lays
>>>>out.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm not sure how vendoring-in a
>>>>tagged
>>>> >>> >>>cordova.js
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>file is
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
error
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
prone
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
though, Bryce. Is it just the manual
>>>> >>>process
>>>> >>> >>>of
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>checking
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
tag in
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova-js, building, and copying the
>>>>file
>>>> >>> >>>over
>>>> >>> >>> to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
implementation? If this is the
>>>>concern
>>>> >>>then
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>certainly,
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tool
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
should be set up to do that
>>>>automatically.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For some reason 1.6.0 tag in
>>>>cordova-js
>>>> >>>was
>>>> >>> >>>added
>>>> >>> >>> >>4
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>days
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago,
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
but
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc2
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what
>>>> >>>happened
>>>> >>> >>> >>there.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In light of the tags not being
>>>>ordered
>>>> >>> >>>properly
>>>> >>> >>> >>and
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
creeping in, I propose, just for the
>>>>1.6.0
>>>> >>> >>> >>release,
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>that
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in
>>>>cordova-js.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the
>>>>latest
>>>> >>>commit
>>>> >>> >>> >>(that
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
file
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek bug fix) - now our tags are at
>>>>least
>>>> >>>in
>>>> >>> >>>the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>right
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
3) rebuild, reintegrate into
>>>>platforms
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
4) unfortunately, retag the platform
>>>> >>> >>> >>implementations
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If retagging is too unholy then f
>>>>it, I
>>>> >>>say we
>>>> >>> >>> tag
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
1.6.1.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis"
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Joe eluded to, checking
>>>>cordova-js
>>>> >>>into
>>>> >>> >>>the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>various
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
repositories holds up the release.
>>>>It is
>>>> >>> >>>also
>>>> >>> >>> >>error
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone -
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
not
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
mention pushing to each repository
>>>>every
>>>> >>>time
>>>> >>> >>> >>there
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>is a
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
change
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
takes
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a lot of time & can get out of of
>>>>sync.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts on having the release
>>>>build
>>>> >>> >>>script
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>handle
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this?
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
far
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
as during normal development and
>>>>testing,
>>>> >>>we
>>>> >>> >>>are
>>>> >>> >>> >>all
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
building
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova.js anyway, and keep current
>>>>in
>>>> >>>our
>>>> >>> >>>own
>>>> >>> >>> >>ways.
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM,
>>>>Simon
>>>> >>> >>>MacDonald
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I just fixed what seems to be a
>>>>zero
>>>>day
>>>> >>> >>>bug in
>>>> >>> >>> >>our
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
implementation
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
of
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
FileWriter. If possible it would be
>>>>good
>>>> >>>to
>>>> >>> >>>get
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>this
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> bug
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
fix
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
into
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
all
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message