incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:37:32 GMT
Should I tag blackberry or Drew, you got that?

On 4/10/12 1:27 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

>Retagged Android 1.6.0
>
>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0
>>
>> On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js (and
>> >also a test into mobile spec) today.
>> >
>> >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we generally
>>had
>> >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of line.
>> >
>> >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That
>>certainly
>> >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in. Gord
>> >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine.
>> >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2.
>> >
>> >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on!
>> >
>> >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least
>>failing
>> >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing.  What I do care
>>about is
>> >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple Android
>> >>devices.
>> >>
>> >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures
>> >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures
>> >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures
>> >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures
>> >>
>> >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them,
>>and
>> >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out.  I'm OK with
>>tagging
>> >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm
>> >>wondering
>> >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well.
>> >>
>> >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed in
>>the
>> >>JS
>> >>earlier.
>> >>
>> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the contact
>> >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one.
>> >>>
>> >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue.
>> >>>
>> >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged.
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II.  Testing
>> >>>appears to
>> >>> >be completely inconsistent.  I'm going to factory reset the Galaxy
>> >>>Nexus
>> >>> >and see if I get the same results.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread.  The thing is that
on
>>my
>> >>> >>Galaxy
>> >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact,
but only
>>a
>> >>> >>>couple
>> >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy)
test
>>that
>> >>> >>>saves,
>> >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not
sure.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what
most
>>people
>> >>> >>>have.  I
>> >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release,
IMO.
>>Why
>> >>> >>>did it
>> >>> >>> >jump up like that?
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework
commit on
>> >>>Android.
>> >>> >>>21
>> >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to
go, Jesse says
>>the
>> >>> >>>same
>> >>> >>> >>for
>> >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with
a 1.6.0
>> >>>directory,
>> >>> >>> then
>> >>> >>> >> tag the docs.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js,
we are
>>just
>> >>> >>>picking
>> >>> >>> a
>> >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all
of us have been
>> >>>working
>> >>> >>> >>with
>> >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we
are not
>>introducing
>> >>> >>> anything
>> >>> >>> >> >new.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the
common code in
>> >>> >>>cordova-js
>> >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms.
We have to
>> >>>stop
>> >>> >>> >>working
>> >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is not in
the spirit of
>>this
>> >>> >>>project.
>> >>> >>> >>We
>> >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need
to be
>>comfortable
>> >>> >>>testing
>> >>> >>> >>on
>> >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms.
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow
break Android, what
>> >>> >>>happens?
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse
MacFadyen
>> >>> >>> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> None.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1?
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> >>> >> >>>  Jesse
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron
<shazron@gmail.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> > None
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0..
Objections?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe
Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag
it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012
at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj
>> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> >>> >>> >>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes
in docs. Durrr.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48
AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually
Compass is not available in
>>BlackBerry
>> >>> >>>before
>> >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would explain
why it's not working on 6.0 :)
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to
file an issue for that in JIRA.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to
update the docs to note this, and
>>then,
>> >>>we
>> >>> >>> >>should be
>> >>> >>> >> >>> good
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44
AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing
tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel
>> >>> >>>callback
>> >>> >>> >>test
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but when
I run the manual tests for accel they all
>> >>>check
>> >>> >>> >>out, so
>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing
tests might be a little blown up.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file
API looks fine, Drew.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to
me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The
>> >>>manual
>> >>> >>> >>tests
>> >>> >>> >> >>>for
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass
keep returning "[object object]" so there
>> >>>seems
>> >>> >>>to
>> >>> >>> >>be a
>> >>> >>> >> >>> little
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake
in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking
>> >>>into
>> >>> >>> that.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve
the compass issue IMO we're good to
>> >>>tag. We
>> >>> >>> >>pass
>> >>> >>> >> >>>on
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs
7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12
10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries
Jesse.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got
my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to
>> >>> >>>reproduce +
>> >>> >>> >>fix
>> >>> >>> >> >>>what
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> you're
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing,
Drew.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12
10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
>> >>> >>> >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my
>>rush to
>> >>> >>>have a
>> >>> >>> >> >>>long
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
weekend.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sorry all.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Cheers,
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
 Jesse
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone5
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser
>> >>> >>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll
>>put it
>> >>> >>>back
>> >>> >>> >>when
>> >>> >>> >> >>>we
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
this
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
sorted out!
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters <
>> >>> >>> >> >>> deedubbu@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
I'm still testing on other versions of BB.
>> >>>Seeing
>> >>> >>>some
>> >>> >>> >>odd
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not
>>sure if
>> >>>it
>> >>> >>>is
>> >>> >>> >>my
>> >>> >>> >> >>>test
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
or
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
real bug.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux
>> >>> >>> >><b@brian.io>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
+1
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
OK so I pulled the latest master from
>> >>>cordova-js
>> >>> >>>and
>> >>> >>> >> >>> integrated
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
latest master for blackberry-webworks.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests
>> >>>failing.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in
>> >>>1.7.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj"
>><fil@adobe.com
>> >
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just
>> >>>have to
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
IMO
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron"
>> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >>wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag
>> >>>reset
>> >>> >>> >> >>>discussion?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
steps
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
take
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I
>>think
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj
>> >>> >>> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm in the process of testing the latest
>>BB
>> >>> >>>code so
>> >>> >>> >> >>>I'll
>> >>> >>> >> >>> let
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
guys
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
know
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
soon how we're looking there.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is that the last thing need before we're
>>all
>> >>> >>>good
>> >>> >>> to
>> >>> >>> >> >>>tag
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
release?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should delete all the 1.6.0
>> >>>tags. We
>> >>> >>> >> >>>haven't
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
released
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
any
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there
>> >>>shouldn't
>> >>> >>>be a
>> >>> >>> >> >>>problem
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
with
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
that.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So I agree with Fil's steps.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Simon Mac Donald
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip
>>Maj
>> >>><
>> >>> >>> >> >>> fil@adobe.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I like the general process Joe lays
>>out.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged
>> >>> >>>cordova.js
>> >>> >>> >> >>>file is
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
error
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
prone
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
though, Bryce. Is it just the manual
>> >>>process
>> >>> >>>of
>> >>> >>> >> >>>checking
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
tag in
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova-js, building, and copying the
>>file
>> >>> >>>over
>> >>> >>> to
>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
implementation? If this is the concern
>> >>>then
>> >>> >>> >> >>>certainly,
>> >>> >>> >> >>> the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tool
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
should be set up to do that
>>automatically.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js
>> >>>was
>> >>> >>>added
>> >>> >>> >>4
>> >>> >>> >> >>>days
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago,
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
but
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc2
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what
>> >>>happened
>> >>> >>> >>there.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In light of the tags not being ordered
>> >>> >>>properly
>> >>> >>> >>and
>> >>> >>> >> >>>the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
creeping in, I propose, just for the
>>1.6.0
>> >>> >>> >>release,
>> >>> >>> >> >>>that
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in
>>cordova-js.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest
>> >>>commit
>> >>> >>> >>(that
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
file
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek bug fix) - now our tags are at
>>least
>> >>>in
>> >>> >>>the
>> >>> >>> >> >>>right
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
4) unfortunately, retag the platform
>> >>> >>> >>implementations
>> >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If retagging is too unholy then f it, I
>> >>>say we
>> >>> >>> tag
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
1.6.1.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis"
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js
>> >>>into
>> >>> >>>the
>> >>> >>> >> >>>various
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
repositories holds up the release.
>>It is
>> >>> >>>also
>> >>> >>> >>error
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone -
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
not
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
mention pushing to each repository
>>every
>> >>>time
>> >>> >>> >>there
>> >>> >>> >> >>>is a
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
change
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
takes
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a lot of time & can get out of of
>>sync.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts on having the release
>>build
>> >>> >>>script
>> >>> >>> >> >>>handle
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this?
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
far
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
as during normal development and
>>testing,
>> >>>we
>> >>> >>>are
>> >>> >>> >>all
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
building
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova.js anyway, and keep current in
>> >>>our
>> >>> >>>own
>> >>> >>> >>ways.
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon
>> >>> >>>MacDonald
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I just fixed what seems to be a zero
>>day
>> >>> >>>bug in
>> >>> >>> >>our
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
implementation
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
of
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
FileWriter. If possible it would be
>>good
>> >>>to
>> >>> >>>get
>> >>> >>> >> >>>this
>> >>> >>> >> >>> bug
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
fix
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
into
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
all
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message