incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:50:22 GMT
.... Already notes in docs. Durrr.

Tag?

On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

>AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry before 7.0.. So that
>would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :)
>
>I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA.
>
>I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, we should be good to
>tag, ya?
>
>On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel callback test failed
>>but when I run the manual tests for accel they all check out, so the 37
>>failing tests might be a little blown up.
>>
>>The file API looks fine, Drew.
>>
>>Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The manual tests for
>>Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there seems to be a little
>>mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking into that.
>>
>>If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to tag. We pass on both a
>>9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
>>
>>
>>On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>No worries Jesse.
>>>
>>>I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to reproduce + fix what
>>>you're
>>>seeing, Drew.
>>>
>>>On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to have a long
>>>>weekend.
>>>>Sorry all.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>  Jesse
>>>>
>>>>Sent from my iPhone5
>>>>
>>>>On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll put it back when we get
>>>>>this
>>>>> sorted out!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters <deedubbu@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB.  Seeing some odd behavior
>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not sure if it is my test app
>>>>>>or
>>>>>> real bug.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from cordova-js and integrated
>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests failing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in 1.7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just have to remove/retag
>>>>>>>>>1.6.0
>>>>>> IMO
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag reset discussion?
with
>>>>>>>>>>steps
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest BB code
so I'll let
>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>> guys
>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're all
good to tag this
>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
>>>>>>>>>>><simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 tags.
We haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>released
>>>>>>>>>>>>any
>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there shouldn't
be a problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged
cordova.js file is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>error
>>>>>> prone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual
process of checking out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>> tag in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the
file over to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>platform
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern
then certainly, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js
was added 4 days ago,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what
happened there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered
properly and the file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>seek
>>>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the
1.6.0 release, that we:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest
commit (that includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at least
in the right order
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform
implementations 1.6.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it,
I say we tag everything
>>>>>> 1.6.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js
into the various
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>platform
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release.
 It is also error prone -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository
every time there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>change
>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of
of sync.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release
build script handle this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As
>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and
testing, we are all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>building
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current
in our own ways.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM,
Simon MacDonald
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be
a zero day bug in our
>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would
be good to get this bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fix
>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message