incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:50:35 GMT
Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr.
>
> Tag?
>
> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry before 7.0.. So that
> >would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :)
> >
> >I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA.
> >
> >I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, we should be good to
> >tag, ya?
> >
> >On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel callback test failed
> >>but when I run the manual tests for accel they all check out, so the 37
> >>failing tests might be a little blown up.
> >>
> >>The file API looks fine, Drew.
> >>
> >>Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The manual tests for
> >>Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there seems to be a little
> >>mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking into that.
> >>
> >>If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to tag. We pass on both a
> >>9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
> >>
> >>
> >>On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>No worries Jesse.
> >>>
> >>>I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to reproduce + fix what
> >>>you're
> >>>seeing, Drew.
> >>>
> >>>On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to have a long
> >>>>weekend.
> >>>>Sorry all.
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>  Jesse
> >>>>
> >>>>Sent from my iPhone5
> >>>>
> >>>>On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll put it back when we
get
> >>>>>this
> >>>>> sorted out!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters <deedubbu@gmail.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB.  Seeing some odd
behavior
> >>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not sure if it is my test
app
> >>>>>>or
> >>>>>> real bug.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from cordova-js and
integrated
> >>>>>>>>with
> >>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests failing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in 1.7.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just have
to remove/retag
> >>>>>>>>>1.6.0
> >>>>>> IMO
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag reset
discussion? with
> >>>>>>>>>>steps
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest
BB code so I'll let
> >>>>>>>>>>>you
> >>>>>> guys
> >>>>>>>>>>> know
> >>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're
all good to tag this
> >>>>>> release?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
> >>>>>>>>>>><simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0
tags. We haven't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>released
> >>>>>>>>>>>>any
> >>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there
shouldn't be a problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>>with
> >>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays
out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a
tagged cordova.js file is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>error
> >>>>>> prone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual
process of checking out
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>a
> >>>>>> tag in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying
the file over to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>platform
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern
then certainly, the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tool
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js
was added 4 days ago,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure
what happened there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered
properly and the file
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>seek
> >>>>>> bug
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for
the 1.6.0 release, that we:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the
latest commit (that includes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> file
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are
at least in the right order
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform
implementations 1.6.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then
f it, I say we tag everything
> >>>>>> 1.6.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis"
<curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js
into the various
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>platform
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release.
 It is also error prone -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>not
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository
every time there is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>change
> >>>>>> takes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get
out of of sync.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release
build script handle this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>As
> >>>>>> far
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development
and testing, we are all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>building
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep
current in our own ways.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04
AM, Simon MacDonald
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems
to be a zero day bug in our
> >>>>>> implementation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible
it would be good to get this bug
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fix
> >>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message