incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Chicken and the Egg: Proposed process for Corodova JS releases
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:47:57 GMT
I don't think Automation would have helped. I grabbed the js that was on
the cordova-js 1.6 tag, which is apparently broken.  The only difference is
that a script would have failed and not me.  We still need to coordinate
releases better.

BTW where was the test that should have failed for seekTo?
On Apr 11, 2012 8:16 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I had to retag Android to 1.6.0. The .js file that Joe added into repo did
> not have the fix for FileWriter.seek().
>
> We really need to make this step part of the packaging of the release. If
> we had a script that builds all the deliverables and then we go off and
> test them would be better than all of us doing our ad hoc builds.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Retagged Android 1.6.0
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Docs and JS (re)tagged 1.6.0
> > >
> > > On 4/10/12 12:37 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Simon fixed a File API seek() issue and dropped it into cordova-js
> (and
> > > >also a test into mobile spec) today.
> > > >
> > > >We've had varying #s of tests passing on Androids before, we generally
> > had
> > > >more tests failing on Android 2.x. Don't think this is too out of
> line.
> > > >
> > > >DirectoryEntry timing out is a bad test to be failing on. That
> certainly
> > > >should be looked into. If it's an easy fix then let's get that in.
> Gord
> > > >and I tested DirectoryEntry on BB7 earlier today and it was fine.
> > > >DirectoryEntry was also passing fine on my Android 4.0.2.
> > > >
> > > >Otherwise, let's tag-n-bag!!!1 Note the issues for 1.7 and move on!
> > > >
> > > >On 4/10/12 12:30 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>I don't care about contacts right now, because those are at least
> > failing
> > > >>consistency across the four devices I'm testing.  What I do care
> about
> > is
> > > >>the fact that we're getting inconsistent tests across multiple
> Android
> > > >>devices.
> > > >>
> > > >>Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.4): 9 Failures
> > > >>Galaxy Nexus (4.0.2): 9 Failures
> > > >>Motorola RAZR (2.3.5): 17 Failures
> > > >>Samsung Nexus S (2.3.6): 23 Failures
> > > >>
> > > >>All these devices were factory reset before we started testing them,
> > and
> > > >>DirectoryEntry and GeoLocation tests are timing out.  I'm OK with
> > tagging
> > > >>this, but this is something that needs to be looked into, and I'm
> > > >>wondering
> > > >>if this is an issue with other platforms as well.
> > > >>
> > > >>Also, I believe Simon mentioned that there was something he fixed in
> > the
> > > >>JS
> > > >>earlier.
> > > >>
> > > >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> It looks like the first contacts.save test fails because the
> contact
> > > >>> returned in the save success callback is the wrong one.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Looks like a native Android issue and not a JS issue.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> IMO JS and Docs can be tagged.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 4/10/12 11:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> >OK, I'm getting 9 failures on the Samsung Galaxy S II.  Testing
> > > >>>appears to
> > > >>> >be completely inconsistent.  I'm going to factory reset the
Galaxy
> > > >>>Nexus
> > > >>> >and see if I get the same results.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread.  The thing
is that on
> > my
> > > >>> >>Galaxy
> > > >>> >> Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures.
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact,
but
> only a
> > > >>> >>>couple
> > > >>> >>> of the tests are failing in that. The round trip
(heavy) test
> > that
> > > >>> >>>saves,
> > > >>> >>> searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So..
Not sure.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's
what most
> people
> > > >>> >>>have.  I
> > > >>> >>> >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us
to release, IMO.
> >  Why
> > > >>> >>>did it
> > > >>> >>> >jump up like that?
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework
commit on
> > > >>>Android.
> > > >>> >>>21
> > > >>> >>> >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus.
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good
to go, Jesse says
> > the
> > > >>> >>>same
> > > >>> >>> >>for
> > > >>> >>> >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good.
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs
with a 1.6.0
> > > >>>directory,
> > > >>> >>> then
> > > >>> >>> >> tag the docs.
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >We have not committed anything new in
cordova-js, we are
> just
> > > >>> >>>picking
> > > >>> >>> a
> > > >>> >>> >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming
all of us have been
> > > >>>working
> > > >>> >>> >>with
> > > >>> >>> >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms,
we are not
> > introducing
> > > >>> >>> anything
> > > >>> >>> >> >new.
> > > >>> >>> >> >
> > > >>> >>> >> >Every time any cordova developer touches
the common code in
> > > >>> >>>cordova-js
> > > >>> >>> >> >that dev should be testing across all
platforms. We have to
> > > >>>stop
> > > >>> >>> >>working
> > > >>> >>> >> >in our little native silos; that is
not in the spirit of
> this
> > > >>> >>>project.
> > > >>> >>> >>We
> > > >>> >>> >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of
us need to be
> comfortable
> > > >>> >>>testing
> > > >>> >>> >>on
> > > >>> >>> >> >all supported platforms.
> > > >>> >>> >> >
> > > >>> >>> >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >
> > > >>> >>> >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes
somehow break Android,
> what
> > > >>> >>>happens?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM,
Jesse MacFadyen
> > > >>> >>> >> >><purplecabbage@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> None.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Is none the new +1?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Cheers,
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>  Jesse
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM,
Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> > > >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> > None
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it
1.6.0.. Objections?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM,
"Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com
> >
> > > >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Are you going
to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10,
2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj
> > > >>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>> >>> >>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already
notes in docs. Durrr.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Tag?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12
10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ
actually Compass is not available in
> > BlackBerry
> > > >>> >>>before
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>7.0.. So
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> that
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> would
explain why it's not working on 6.0 :)
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going
to file an issue for that in JIRA.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going
to update the docs to note this, and
> then,
> > > >>>we
> > > >>> >>> >>should be
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> good
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12
10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37
failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The
> accel
> > > >>> >>>callback
> > > >>> >>> >>test
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> failed
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> but
when I run the manual tests for accel they
> all
> > > >>>check
> > > >>> >>> >>out, so
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> 37
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> failing
tests might be a little blown up.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> The
file API looks fine, Drew.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks
to me like Compass may be a little f'ed.
> The
> > > >>>manual
> > > >>> >>> >>tests
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>for
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> Compass
keep returning "[object object]" so there
> > > >>>seems
> > > >>> >>>to
> > > >>> >>> >>be a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> little
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> mistake
in there somewhere. Gord and I are
> looking
> > > >>>into
> > > >>> >>> that.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> If
we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to
> > > >>>tag. We
> > > >>> >>> >>pass
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>on
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> both a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> 9900
(runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0).
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>> On
4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
No worries Jesse.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to
> > > >>> >>>reproduce +
> > > >>> >>> >>fix
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>what
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
you're
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
seeing, Drew.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen"
> > > >>> >>> >> >>><purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my
> rush
> > to
> > > >>> >>>have a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>long
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
weekend.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sorry all.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Cheers,
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
 Jesse
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone5
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> >>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android.  I'll
> put
> > it
> > > >>> >>>back
> > > >>> >>> >>when
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>we
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> get
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
this
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
sorted out!
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters
> <
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> deedubbu@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
I'm still testing on other versions of BB.
> > > >>>Seeing
> > > >>> >>>some
> > > >>> >>> >>odd
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> behavior
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
all of a sudden in File API on OS 6.  Not
> sure
> > if
> > > >>>it
> > > >>> >>>is
> > > >>> >>> >>my
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>test
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> app
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
or
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
real bug.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian
> LeRoux
> > > >>> >>> >><b@brian.io>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
+1
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
OK so I pulled the latest master from
> > > >>>cordova-js
> > > >>> >>>and
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> integrated
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
with
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
latest master for blackberry-webworks.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests
> > > >>>failing.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest
> in
> > > >>>1.7.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <
> > fil@adobe.com
> > > >
> > > >>> >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just
> > > >>>have to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> remove/retag
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
IMO
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron"
> > > >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >>wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag
> > > >>>reset
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>discussion?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> with
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
steps
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
take
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I
> > think
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip
> Maj
> > > >>> >>> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm in the process of testing the latest
> > BB
> > > >>> >>>code so
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>I'll
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> let
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
guys
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
know
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
soon how we're looking there.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is that the last thing need before we're
> > all
> > > >>> >>>good
> > > >>> >>> to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>tag
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
release?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald"
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think we should delete all the 1.6.0
> > > >>>tags. We
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>haven't
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
released
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
any
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there
> > > >>>shouldn't
> > > >>> >>>be a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>problem
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
with
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
that.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So I agree with Fil's steps.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Simon Mac Donald
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip
> > Maj
> > > >>><
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I like the general process Joe lays
> out.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged
> > > >>> >>>cordova.js
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>file is
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
error
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
prone
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
though, Bryce. Is it just the manual
> > > >>>process
> > > >>> >>>of
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>checking
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> out
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
tag in
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova-js, building, and copying the
> > file
> > > >>> >>>over
> > > >>> >>> to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
implementation? If this is the concern
> > > >>>then
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>certainly,
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tool
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
should be set up to do that
> > automatically.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For some reason 1.6.0 tag in
> cordova-js
> > > >>>was
> > > >>> >>>added
> > > >>> >>> >>4
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>days
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> ago,
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
but
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.6.0rc2
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what
> > > >>>happened
> > > >>> >>> >>there.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In light of the tags not being ordered
> > > >>> >>>properly
> > > >>> >>> >>and
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> file
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
creeping in, I propose, just for the
> > 1.6.0
> > > >>> >>> >>release,
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>that
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> we:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in
> > cordova-js.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the
> latest
> > > >>>commit
> > > >>> >>> >>(that
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> includes
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
file
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
seek bug fix) - now our tags are at
> > least
> > > >>>in
> > > >>> >>>the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>right
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> order
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
4) unfortunately, retag the platform
> > > >>> >>> >>implementations
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> 1.6.0
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If retagging is too unholy then f it,
> I
> > > >>>say we
> > > >>> >>> tag
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> everything
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
1.6.1.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis"
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js
> > > >>>into
> > > >>> >>>the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>various
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
repositories holds up the release.
>  It
> > is
> > > >>> >>>also
> > > >>> >>> >>error
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> prone -
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
not
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
to
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
mention pushing to each repository
> > every
> > > >>>time
> > > >>> >>> >>there
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>is a
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
change
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
takes
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a lot of time & can get out of of
> sync.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts on having the release
> > build
> > > >>> >>>script
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>handle
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> this?
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
far
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
as during normal development and
> > testing,
> > > >>>we
> > > >>> >>>are
> > > >>> >>> >>all
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
building
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cordova.js anyway, and keep current
> in
> > > >>>our
> > > >>> >>>own
> > > >>> >>> >>ways.
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM,
> Simon
> > > >>> >>>MacDonald
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I just fixed what seems to be a zero
> > day
> > > >>> >>>bug in
> > > >>> >>> >>our
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
implementation
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
of
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
FileWriter. If possible it would be
> > good
> > > >>>to
> > > >>> >>>get
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>this
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> bug
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
fix
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
into
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
all
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
platform
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >> >>>
> > > >>> >>> >> >
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> >>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message