incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.6.1
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:36 GMT
Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE
files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed
all the bugs I saw.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> Android is tagged.
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Done
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any
> > > > complaints.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and tag
> > JS
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js
> > coming,
> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify
the
> > history.
> > > >  We
> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since
that
> > would
> > > be
> > > > > >>>more
> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't
do
> this
> > > next
> > > > > >>> time".   I'm not that invested in it.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow),
it
> > should
> > > be
> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same
as 1.6.0.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that
changed the
> common
> > js
> > > > > >>>>API, and
> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure
this one thing out
> > for
> > > > > >>>>1.7?
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under
the impression
> that
> > > iOS
> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite
confused.
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add
to 1.6.1?
> Although
> > > > > >>>>nothing
> > > > > >>>> that
> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built
for wp7. ( ie, all
> in
> > > my
> > > > > >>>> platform
> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1
too early
> > anyways..
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron
<shazron@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution
being noted (it
> > > exists), I
> > > > > >>>>will
> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1
(I acknowledge
> my
> > > > > >>>>mistake in
> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can
we branch off 1.6.0
> > then
> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1?
> > > > > >>>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe
Bowser <
> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we
leave the thing in the
> > > common
> > > > > >>>>JS,
> > > > > >>>> even
> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be
there.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM,
Shazron <
> > shazron@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit?
Then, no.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43
PM, Joe Bowser <
> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase
the head, push this out and
> get
> > > this
> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012
at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
> > > fil@adobe.com>
> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific
parameters (like allow
> > edit
> > > > and
> > > > > >>>>those
> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to
cordova-js, so yeah, we left them
> in
> > > > there
> > > > > >>>>as we
> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without
deprecation.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with
the iOS issue without needing
> an
> > > API
> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not,
leave it in there, but docs need to
> > > > > >>>>updated too.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing
the public API is a long and
> > > > > >>>>difficult
> > > > > >>>> >>>process
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only
get tougher with every platform we
> > add
> > > > > >>>>support
> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM,
"Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have
to scrap the other three(?) iOS
> > parameters
> > > > > >>>>ones
> > > > > >>>> that
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist
in common if you noticed. Don't know
> > how
> > > we
> > > > > >>>>merge
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this
one properly because taking those
> out
> > > > will
> > > > > >>>>break
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that
is using it, but a deprecation is the
> > way
> > > > to
> > > > > >>>>go as
> > > > > >>>> >>>per
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy
.
> > We
> > > > can
> > > > > >>>> remove
> > > > > >>>> >>> this
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and
I'll find a way to get this in
> > somehow.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12,
2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem
is that this parameter doesn't belong
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>> common
> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just
ignored in Android, but the whole point
> of
> > > > > >>>>cordova-js
> > > > > >>>> >>>is
> > > > > >>>> >>> so
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common.
 It'd look pretty screwed up to add
> > this
> > > > to
> > > > > >>>>the
> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu,
Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix
two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu,
Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
so what's the point of this new parameter?
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
> > shazron@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I
did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I
> > can
> > > > > >>>>branch
> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> > > > > >>>> >>> and
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick
your latest commit for 1.6.1
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On
Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj
> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
I saw something in the iOS commit logs for
> > this.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
Shaz can you comment?
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can
we revert this, since this looks like
> it's
> > > > > >>>>intended
> > > > > >>>> >>>for
> > > > > >>>> >>> both
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and
iOS, but I don't think it should be in
> > > 1.6.1.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On
Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj <
> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
I was actually just looking at that
> myself.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
Looks like it's an iOS-only param..  sigh.
> > We
> > > > > >>>>gotta
> > > > > >>>> stop
> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
especially if we don't update
> documentation.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>Has anyone tested the cropToSize param
> for
> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet?
 I
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>didn't
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>notice that change until now.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip
> Maj
> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the
> > JS
> > > > > >>>>should
> > > > > >>>> >>>work
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake
> > tasks
> > > in
> > > > > >>>>the
> > > > > >>>> >>>future
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> async, make sure you add the 4th
> "async"
> > > > > >>>>parameter
> > > > > >>>> to
> > > > > >>>> >>> the
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>function
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> and set it to true, and call complete()
> > > when
> > > > > >>>>the
> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> See
> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
example.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged
> > > > 1.6.1.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis
> > > KADRI
> > > > <
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1
> > before
> > > > > >>>>end of
> > > > > >>>> >>>day
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> thorough testing.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM,
> > Shazron
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag
> > as
> > > > > >>>>well in
> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM,
> > > Shazron
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was
> > > released,
> > > > > >>>>I'm
> > > > > >>>> >>>going
> > > > > >>>> >>> to
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release"
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move
> > > > > >>>>outstanding
> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>version
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > > tag.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM,
> > > Filip
> > > > > >>>>Maj
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >> The JS needs patching too.
> Since
> > > > > >>>>adding the
> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> packaging
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default
> task
> > > > isn't
> > > > > >>>> >>>running
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >> You can manually run "jake
> build"
> > > and
> > > > > >>>>"jake
> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>"jake" on
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> its
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it
> out.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" <
> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.  iOS
> has a
> > > few
> > > > > >>>> commits
> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for
> > first
> > > > > >>>>thing
> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>repackage?
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17
> PM,
> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered
> in
> > > > > >>>>Cordova
> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>a
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>new
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > tag
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>and
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> release. You can check out
> the
> > > bug
> > > > > >>>>on the
> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just
> > > > > >>>>repackage
> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>fixed as
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > we
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if
> > > people
> > > > > >>>>are
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>not.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had
> > some
> > > > > >>>>major
> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which
he
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>fixed
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> now
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>and
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
> release.
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>>> -Steve
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> > >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>>> >>>
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message