incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
Date Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:04:31 GMT
kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would
rather keep the "rc" tagging for now.

Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald


On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether we
> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit
> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the  x.x.0
> releases.
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing?
> >
> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this:
> > >
> > >1) tag 1.7.0
> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs
> > >3) tag 1.7.1
> > >4) crap one more bug
> > >5) tag 1.7.2
> > >6) phew, regression passed
> > >7) Release 1.7.2!
> > >
> > >What do you think?
> > >
> > >Simon Mac Donald
> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <herm.wong@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> From: fil@adobe.com
> > >> > > >> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Let's tag it!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> >Hey
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should
probably tag
> > >> 1.7.0rc1
> > >> > > >>this
> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes,
etc in before
> > >> moving
> > >> > > >>on to
> > >> > > >> >1.8.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with
2.0, can we
> > >>just
> > >> > > >> >increment
> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear
up a lot of
> > >> > confusion.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >Joe
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message