incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.6.1
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:38:18 GMT
I am commited and tagged

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Logic error - no worries, I patched it (going to re-do 1.6.1 iOS)
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Did I f that up?
> >
> > On 4/12/12 5:07 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Sigh - user reported iOS bug
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8
> >>907
> >>(you know who you are ;)
> >>
> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA
> >>>too.
> >>>
> >>> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in
> >>> two hours haha
> >>>
> >>> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork,
> >>>>LICENSE/NOTICE
> >>>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I
> fixed
> >>>>all the bugs I sawS
> >>>>
> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Android is tagged.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Done
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear
> >>>>>any
> >>>>> > > > complaints.
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead
> >>>>>and
> >>>>>tag
> >>>>> > JS
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to
> cordova-js
> >>>>> > coming,
> >>>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1
> >>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
> >>>>> > > > > >>
> >>>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser
> >>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the
> >>>>> > history.
> >>>>> > > >  We
> >>>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since
> >>>>>that
> >>>>> > would
> >>>>> > > be
> >>>>> > > > > >>>more
> >>>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't
> >>>>>do
> >>>>> this
> >>>>> > > next
> >>>>> > > > > >>> time".   I'm not that invested in it.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron
> >>>>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow),
> >>>>>it
> >>>>> > should
> >>>>> > > be
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as
> >>>>>1.6.0.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj
> >>>>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the
> >>>>> common
> >>>>> > js
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>API, and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one
> >>>>>thing
> >>>>>out
> >>>>> > for
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>1.7?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the
> >>>>>impression
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> > > iOS
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1?
> >>>>> Although
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>nothing
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> that
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. (
> ie,
> >>>>>all
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> > > my
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> platform
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early
> >>>>> > anyways..
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron
> >>>>><shazron@gmail.com
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted
> (it
> >>>>> > > exists), I
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>will
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I
> >>>>>acknowledge
> >>>>> my
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off
> >>>>>1.6.0
> >>>>> > then
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser <
> >>>>> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in
> >>>>>the
> >>>>> > > common
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>JS,
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> even
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron <
> >>>>> > shazron@gmail.com
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <
> >>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out
> >>>>>and
> >>>>> get
> >>>>> > > this
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
> >>>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like
> >>>>>allow
> >>>>> > edit
> >>>>> > > > and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>those
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left
> >>>>>them
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> > > > there
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>as we
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without
> >>>>>needing
> >>>>> an
> >>>>> > > API
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs
> >>>>>need to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>updated too.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a
> long
> >>>>>and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>difficult
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every
> >>>>>platform
> >>>>>we
> >>>>> > add
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>support
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron"
> >>>>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS
> >>>>> > parameters
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>ones
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> that
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't
> >>>>>know
> >>>>> > how
> >>>>> > > we
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>merge
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking
> >>>>>those
> >>>>> out
> >>>>> > > > will
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>break
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation
> >>>>>is
> >>>>>the
> >>>>> > way
> >>>>> > > > to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>go as
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy .
> >>>>> > We
> >>>>> > > > can
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> remove
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in
> >>>>> > somehow.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't
> >>>>>belong
> >>>>> > in
> >>>>> > > > the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> common
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole
> >>>>>point
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common.  It'd look pretty screwed up
> to
> >>>>>add
> >>>>> > this
> >>>>> > > > to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on
> >>>>>iOS
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new
> >>>>>parameter?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
> >>>>> > shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the
> >>>>>cordova-js? I
> >>>>> > can
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>branch
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip
> >>>>>Maj
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs
> >>>>>for
> >>>>> > this.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
> >>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks
> >>>>>like
> >>>>> it's
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>intended
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should
> be
> >>>>>in
> >>>>> > > 1.6.1.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip
> >>>>>Maj <
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that
> >>>>> myself.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param..
> >>>>>sigh.
> >>>>> > We
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>gotta
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> stop
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update
> >>>>> documentation.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize
> >>>>>param
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet?  I
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM,
> >>>>>Filip
> >>>>> Maj
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task
> >>>>>in
> >>>>>the
> >>>>> > JS
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>should
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the
> >>>>>jake
> >>>>> > tasks
> >>>>> > > in
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th
> >>>>> "async"
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>parameter
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call
> >>>>>complete()
> >>>>> > > when
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>>>http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> >>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is
> >>>>>tagged
> >>>>> > > > 1.6.1.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
> >>>>>Anis
> >>>>> > > KADRI
> >>>>> > > > <
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to
> >>>>>1.6.1
> >>>>> > before
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>end of
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30
> >>>>>PM,
> >>>>> > Shazron
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1
> >>>>>version
> >>>>>tag
> >>>>> > as
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>well in
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29
> >>>>>PM,
> >>>>> > > Shazron
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0
> >>>>>was
> >>>>> > > released,
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>I'm
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release"
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and
> >>>>>move
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
> >>>>>2:26
> >>>>>PM,
> >>>>> > > Filip
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>Maj
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching
> too.
> >>>>> Since
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>adding the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the
> >>>>>default
> >>>>> task
> >>>>> > > > isn't
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run
> "jake
> >>>>> build"
> >>>>> > > and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>"jake
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure
> >>>>>it
> >>>>> out.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM,
> >>>>>"Shazron" <
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.
> >>>>>iOS
> >>>>> has a
> >>>>> > > few
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> commits
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim
> >>>>>for
> >>>>> > first
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>thing
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
> >>>>>2:17
> >>>>> PM,
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been
> >>>>>discovered
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check
> >>>>>out
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> > > bug
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>on the
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense
> to
> >>>>>just
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>repackage
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to
> know
> >>>>>if
> >>>>> > > people
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>are
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada
> also
> >>>>>had
> >>>>> > some
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>major
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
> >>>>> > > > > >>>> >
> >>>>> > > > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message