incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.6.1
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:11:08 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-496

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sigh - user reported iOS bug
> http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8907
> (you know who you are ;)
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too.
>>
>> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in
>> two hours haha
>>
>> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE
>>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed
>>>all the bugs I sawS
>>>
>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Android is tagged.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Done
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear
any
>>>> > > > complaints.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go
ahead and
>>>>tag
>>>> > JS
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to
cordova-js
>>>> > coming,
>>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser
>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it
does modify the
>>>> > history.
>>>> > > >  We
>>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it
instead, since that
>>>> > would
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > > >>>more
>>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in
and say "don't do
>>>> this
>>>> > > next
>>>> > > > > >>> time".   I'm not that invested in it.
>>>> > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron
<shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js
(somehow), it
>>>> > should
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just
be the same as
>>>>1.6.0.
>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new
commit that changed the
>>>> common
>>>> > js
>>>> > > > > >>>>API, and
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1,
and figure this one thing
>>>>out
>>>> > for
>>>> > > > > >>>>1.7?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but
I am under the impression
>>>> that
>>>> > > iOS
>>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said
I'm quite confused.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js
commits to add to 1.6.1?
>>>> Although
>>>> > > > > >>>>nothing
>>>> > > > > >>>> that
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what
is built for wp7. ( ie,
>>>>all
>>>> in
>>>> > > my
>>>> > > > > >>>> platform
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged
the JS 1.6.1 too early
>>>> > anyways..
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51
PM, Shazron
>>>><shazron@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's
contribution being noted (it
>>>> > > exists), I
>>>> > > > > >>>>will
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common
code post-1.6.1 (I
>>>>acknowledge
>>>> my
>>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first
place). Can we branch off
>>>>1.6.0
>>>> > then
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest
fix for 1.6.1?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
3:47 PM, Joe Bowser <
>>>> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing
that we leave the thing in
>>>>the
>>>> > > common
>>>> > > > > >>>>JS,
>>>> > > > > >>>> even
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed
to be there.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012
at 3:45 PM, Shazron <
>>>> > shazron@gmail.com
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing
lose that commit? Then, no.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12,
2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <
>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we
just rebase the head, push this out and
>>>> get
>>>> > > this
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr
12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct,
those iOS-specific parameters (like
>>>>allow
>>>> > edit
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > > > >>>>those
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed
prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left
>>>>them
>>>> in
>>>> > > > there
>>>> > > > > >>>>as we
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want
to remove without deprecation.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you
can deal with the iOS issue without
>>>>needing
>>>> an
>>>> > > API
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that.
If not, leave it in there, but docs
>>>>need to
>>>> > > > > >>>>updated too.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending
and changing the public API is a long
>>>>and
>>>> > > > > >>>>difficult
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and
will only get tougher with every platform
>>>>we
>>>> > add
>>>> > > > > >>>>support
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12
3:37 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then
we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS
>>>> > parameters
>>>> > > > > >>>>ones
>>>> > > > > >>>> that
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already
exist in common if you noticed. Don't
>>>>know
>>>> > how
>>>> > > we
>>>> > > > > >>>>merge
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?)
this one properly because taking
>>>>those
>>>> out
>>>> > > > will
>>>> > > > > >>>>break
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone
that is using it, but a deprecation is
>>>>the
>>>> > way
>>>> > > > to
>>>> > > > > >>>>go as
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy .
>>>> > We
>>>> > > > can
>>>> > > > > >>>> remove
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new
commit and I'll find a way to get this in
>>>> > somehow.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On
Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
The problem is that this parameter doesn't
>>>>belong
>>>> > in
>>>> > > > the
>>>> > > > > >>>> common
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
be just ignored in Android, but the whole
>>>>point
>>>> of
>>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
it's common.  It'd look pretty screwed up to
>>>>add
>>>> > this
>>>> > > > to
>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
>>>> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> so what's the point of this new parameter?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
> On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
>>>> > shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>I did. Do we want to revert the
>>>>cordova-js? I
>>>> > can
>>>> > > > > >>>>branch
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj
>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs
>>>>for
>>>> > this.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> Shaz can you comment?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like
>>>> it's
>>>> > > > > >>>>intended
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
Android
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be
>>>>in
>>>> > > 1.6.1.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip
>>>>Maj <
>>>> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> I was actually just looking at that
>>>> myself.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param..
>>>>sigh.
>>>> > We
>>>> > > > > >>>>gotta
>>>> > > > > >>>> stop
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> especially if we don't update
>>>> documentation.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param
>>>> for
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet?
 I
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >didn't
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >notice that change until now.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip
>>>> Maj
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in
>>>>the
>>>> > JS
>>>> > > > > >>>>should
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>now.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake
>>>> > tasks
>>>> > > in
>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>them
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th
>>>> "async"
>>>> > > > > >>>>parameter
>>>> > > > > >>>> to
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>function
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> and set it to true, and call
>>>>complete()
>>>> > > when
>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> See
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> example.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is
>>>>tagged
>>>> > > > 1.6.1.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
>>>>Anis
>>>> > > KADRI
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1
>>>> > before
>>>> > > > > >>>>end of
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>some
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM,
>>>> > Shazron
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version
>>>>tag
>>>> > as
>>>> > > > > >>>>well in
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29
>>>>PM,
>>>> > > Shazron
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was
>>>> > > released,
>>>> > > > > >>>>I'm
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>"Release"
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and
>>>>move
>>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>version
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > tag.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26
>>>>PM,
>>>> > > Filip
>>>> > > > > >>>>Maj
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too.
>>>> Since
>>>> > > > > >>>>adding the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> packaging
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default
>>>> task
>>>> > > > isn't
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake
>>>> build"
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > > > >>>>"jake
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>"jake" on
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> its
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it
>>>> out.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM,
>>>>"Shazron" <
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.  iOS
>>>> has a
>>>> > > few
>>>> > > > > >>>> commits
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>in
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for
>>>> > first
>>>> > > > > >>>>thing
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>to
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17
>>>> PM,
>>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been
>>>>discovered
>>>> in
>>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>requires
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>a
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>new
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > tag
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out
>>>> the
>>>> > > bug
>>>> > > > > >>>>on the
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>at
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>co
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to
>>>>just
>>>> > > > > >>>>repackage
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>bug
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>fixed as
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > we
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know
>>>>if
>>>> > > people
>>>> > > > > >>>>are
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>or
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>not.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also
>>>>had
>>>> > some
>>>> > > > > >>>>major
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which
he
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>has
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>fixed
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> now
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
>>>> release.
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message