incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.6.1
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:27:02 GMT
Logic error - no worries, I patched it (going to re-do 1.6.1 iOS)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> Did I f that up?
>
> On 4/12/12 5:07 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Sigh - user reported iOS bug
>>http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8
>>907
>>(you know who you are ;)
>>
>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA
>>>too.
>>>
>>> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in
>>> two hours haha
>>>
>>> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork,
>>>>LICENSE/NOTICE
>>>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed
>>>>all the bugs I sawS
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Android is tagged.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Done
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear
>>>>>any
>>>>> > > > complaints.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead
>>>>>and
>>>>>tag
>>>>> > JS
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js
>>>>> > coming,
>>>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel*
>>>>> > > > > >>
>>>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser
>>>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the
>>>>> > history.
>>>>> > > >  We
>>>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since
>>>>>that
>>>>> > would
>>>>> > > be
>>>>> > > > > >>>more
>>>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't
>>>>>do
>>>>> this
>>>>> > > next
>>>>> > > > > >>> time".   I'm not that invested in it.
>>>>> > > > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron
>>>>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow),
>>>>>it
>>>>> > should
>>>>> > > be
>>>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as
>>>>>1.6.0.
>>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj
>>>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the
>>>>> common
>>>>> > js
>>>>> > > > > >>>>API, and
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one
>>>>>thing
>>>>>out
>>>>> > for
>>>>> > > > > >>>>1.7?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the
>>>>>impression
>>>>> that
>>>>> > > iOS
>>>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1?
>>>>> Although
>>>>> > > > > >>>>nothing
>>>>> > > > > >>>> that
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie,
>>>>>all
>>>>> in
>>>>> > > my
>>>>> > > > > >>>> platform
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder )
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early
>>>>> > anyways..
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron
>>>>><shazron@gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it
>>>>> > > exists), I
>>>>> > > > > >>>>will
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I
>>>>>acknowledge
>>>>> my
>>>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off
>>>>>1.6.0
>>>>> > then
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser <
>>>>> > > bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in
>>>>>the
>>>>> > > common
>>>>> > > > > >>>>JS,
>>>>> > > > > >>>> even
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron <
>>>>> > shazron@gmail.com
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <
>>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out
>>>>>and
>>>>> get
>>>>> > > this
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <
>>>>> > > fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like
>>>>>allow
>>>>> > edit
>>>>> > > > and
>>>>> > > > > >>>>those
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones)
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left
>>>>>them
>>>>> in
>>>>> > > > there
>>>>> > > > > >>>>as we
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without
>>>>>needing
>>>>> an
>>>>> > > API
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs
>>>>>need to
>>>>> > > > > >>>>updated too.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long
>>>>>and
>>>>> > > > > >>>>difficult
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every
>>>>>platform
>>>>>we
>>>>> > add
>>>>> > > > > >>>>support
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron"
>>>>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS
>>>>> > parameters
>>>>> > > > > >>>>ones
>>>>> > > > > >>>> that
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't
>>>>>know
>>>>> > how
>>>>> > > we
>>>>> > > > > >>>>merge
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking
>>>>>those
>>>>> out
>>>>> > > > will
>>>>> > > > > >>>>break
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation
>>>>>is
>>>>>the
>>>>> > way
>>>>> > > > to
>>>>> > > > > >>>>go as
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy .
>>>>> > We
>>>>> > > > can
>>>>> > > > > >>>> remove
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in
>>>>> > somehow.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser
>>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't
>>>>>belong
>>>>> > in
>>>>> > > > the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> common
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole
>>>>>point
>>>>> of
>>>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common.  It'd look pretty screwed up to
>>>>>add
>>>>> > this
>>>>> > > > to
>>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs,
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron
>>>>> > > > > >>>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on
>>>>>iOS
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj
>>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new
>>>>>parameter?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <
>>>>> > shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the
>>>>>cordova-js? I
>>>>> > can
>>>>> > > > > >>>>branch
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip
>>>>>Maj
>>>>> > > > > >>>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs
>>>>>for
>>>>> > this.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <
>>>>> > > > bowserj@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks
>>>>>like
>>>>> it's
>>>>> > > > > >>>>intended
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be
>>>>>in
>>>>> > > 1.6.1.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip
>>>>>Maj <
>>>>> > > > > >>>> fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that
>>>>> myself.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param..
>>>>>sigh.
>>>>> > We
>>>>> > > > > >>>>gotta
>>>>> > > > > >>>> stop
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that,
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update
>>>>> documentation.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize
>>>>>param
>>>>> for
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet?  I
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM,
>>>>>Filip
>>>>> Maj
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>><fil@adobe.com
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task
>>>>>in
>>>>>the
>>>>> > JS
>>>>> > > > > >>>>should
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the
>>>>>jake
>>>>> > tasks
>>>>> > > in
>>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th
>>>>> "async"
>>>>> > > > > >>>>parameter
>>>>> > > > > >>>> to
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task()
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call
>>>>>complete()
>>>>> > > when
>>>>> > > > > >>>>the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>>>http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser"
>>>>> > > > > >>>><bowserj@gmail.com
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is
>>>>>tagged
>>>>> > > > 1.6.1.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
>>>>>Anis
>>>>> > > KADRI
>>>>> > > > <
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to
>>>>>1.6.1
>>>>> > before
>>>>> > > > > >>>>end of
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30
>>>>>PM,
>>>>> > Shazron
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1
>>>>>version
>>>>>tag
>>>>> > as
>>>>> > > > > >>>>well in
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira...
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29
>>>>>PM,
>>>>> > > Shazron
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0
>>>>>was
>>>>> > > released,
>>>>> > > > > >>>>I'm
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release"
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and
>>>>>move
>>>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
>>>>>2:26
>>>>>PM,
>>>>> > > Filip
>>>>> > > > > >>>>Maj
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><fil@adobe.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too.
>>>>> Since
>>>>> > > > > >>>>adding the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the
>>>>>default
>>>>> task
>>>>> > > > isn't
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake
>>>>> build"
>>>>> > > and
>>>>> > > > > >>>>"jake
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test"
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure
>>>>>it
>>>>> out.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM,
>>>>>"Shazron" <
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.
>>>>>iOS
>>>>> has a
>>>>> > > few
>>>>> > > > > >>>> commits
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim
>>>>>for
>>>>> > first
>>>>> > > > > >>>>thing
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
>>>>>2:17
>>>>> PM,
>>>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been
>>>>>discovered
>>>>> in
>>>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check
>>>>>out
>>>>> the
>>>>> > > bug
>>>>> > > > > >>>>on the
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>>
>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to
>>>>>just
>>>>> > > > > >>>>repackage
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know
>>>>>if
>>>>> > > people
>>>>> > > > > >>>>are
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also
>>>>>had
>>>>> > some
>>>>> > > > > >>>>major
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1
>>>>> release.
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >>>
>>>>> > > > > >>>> >
>>>>> > > > > >>>>
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message