incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Tim Kim as committer
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:38:09 GMT
I've started that here:

Cordova community: we should hash this out. Discuss here/contribute to the

On 3/23/12 10:26 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <> wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Filip Maj <> wrote:
>> I'm confused as to why we have to have *any* barriers to entry,
>> if the community votes on committership anyways.
>> I would be a fan of a "if x people vote +1, and no one voted -1, let the
>> person in" mentality.
>> What downsides does this approach pose?
>It should be fine as long as the same criteria is applied to all
>members of the community. We don't want a situation where only one of
>two otherwise identical community members gets nominated and voted in
>while the other is either not nominated in the first place or rejected
>with a -1 vote. Having the expected level of contribution (even if
>it's just "show up on the mailing list and ask to be given commit
>access") written down somewhere as Ross suggested helps prevent this
>Note also that by granting someone membership in the (P)PMC, you also
>give them veto power [1] over all code changes. That's not necessarily
>a problem, just something to take in to account when inviting new
>Jukka Zitting

View raw message