incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: tagging 1.5rc friday
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:36:12 GMT
The "plugins" global makes me cringe - adding "PhoneGap" for compatibility
makes sense but I'd like to see us plan to phase that out in the next few
point releases. Accompany with a couple blog posts / guides on upgrading
and what is changing and we should be good.

On 3/5/12 12:19 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hey all,
>
>I added a couple of methods (addConstructor, addPlugin) into the
>common-js code and created a variable PhoneGap that points to cordova.
>This way all existing plugins that work on Android should be able to
>work without changes to their JS.
>
>I deleted the current 1.5.0 tag and retagged with my latest commit
>being the head.
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a=
>commit;h=8923e52a5ed5e9ea4c3c5f7ed49400cac668a4d6
>
>If Steve wants to re-generate the release with that tag it would be
>for the best.
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> There is a critical bug with maintaining compatibility for non-core
>>plugins
>> for Android that we have a fix for.  Simon will be dropping it today,
>>and
>> I'd like to get that in to release 1.5.  IMHO compatibility makes sense
>>to
>> maintain until all platforms migrate to cordova-js.
>>
>> Regarding 1.5.0 as an Apache release.  Do we know how close we are?  If
>> it's only a few days - then I would vote for finishing those items that
>>are
>> holding up an official release.  I really want 1.6.0 to be a robust
>> official release, so would have more confidence if we can get 1.5.0
>> official.  What is the list of items required to be official?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryce
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Guys,
>>>
>>> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable apache
>>> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get 1.5
>>>out
>>> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as
>>>a non
>>> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an
>>>apache
>>> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors
>>>and be
>>> ready for 1.6.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> > Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in
>>>the
>>> > apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work out.
>>> >
>>> > I will take another read through that.
>>> >
>>> > -Steve
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now.
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> Please review them before we move them and make them public.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to
>>>Apache. I
>>> > have a
>>> > >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted
to
>>>make
>>> > this
>>> > >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need?
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > > Have you read
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet?
>>> > >
>>> > > I've just started, for weinre.
>>> > >
>>> > > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have
>>> > > "incubating" in the name.  I noticed a whole bunch of issues when
>>> reading
>>> > > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki
>>>for
>>> > > things I needed to 'fix'.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Patrick Mueller
>>> > > http://muellerware.org
>>> >
>>>


Mime
View raw message