incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: tagging 1.5rc friday
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:06:49 GMT
Sorry for being totally out of context. My phone just managed to get online
properly now.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, we should talk about deleting and recommitting tags. I'm OK with it if
> it's to fix my screw-up, but when its a fundamental bug, I think we should
> issue a new release, like a 1.5.1.
>
> As for the Apache release, we don't have headers on docs yet. We need
> headers before we can be Apache.
>
> Please correct me and clean the JIRA if I am wrong.
>
> Joe
> On Mar 5, 2012 12:20 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I added a couple of methods (addConstructor, addPlugin) into the
>> common-js code and created a variable PhoneGap that points to cordova.
>> This way all existing plugins that work on Android should be able to
>> work without changes to their JS.
>>
>> I deleted the current 1.5.0 tag and retagged with my latest commit
>> being the head.
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a=commit;h=8923e52a5ed5e9ea4c3c5f7ed49400cac668a4d6
>>
>> If Steve wants to re-generate the release with that tag it would be
>> for the best.
>>
>> Simon Mac Donald
>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.bryce@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > There is a critical bug with maintaining compatibility for non-core
>> plugins
>> > for Android that we have a fix for.  Simon will be dropping it today,
>> and
>> > I'd like to get that in to release 1.5.  IMHO compatibility makes sense
>> to
>> > maintain until all platforms migrate to cordova-js.
>> >
>> > Regarding 1.5.0 as an Apache release.  Do we know how close we are?  If
>> > it's only a few days - then I would vote for finishing those items that
>> are
>> > holding up an official release.  I really want 1.6.0 to be a robust
>> > official release, so would have more confidence if we can get 1.5.0
>> > official.  What is the list of items required to be official?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Bryce
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey Guys,
>> >>
>> >> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable apache
>> >> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get 1.5
>> out
>> >> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as
>> a non
>> >> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an
>> apache
>> >> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors
>> and be
>> >> ready for 1.6.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> -Steve
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in
>> the
>> >> > apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work out.
>> >> >
>> >> > I will take another read through that.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Steve
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Please review them before we move them and make them public.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to
>> Apache. I
>> >> > have a
>> >> > >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted
to
>> make
>> >> > this
>> >> > >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Have you read
>> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I've just started, for weinre.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have
>> >> > > "incubating" in the name.  I noticed a whole bunch of issues when
>> >> reading
>> >> > > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki
>> for
>> >> > > things I needed to 'fix'.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Patrick Mueller
>> >> > > http://muellerware.org
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message