incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gord Tanner <g...@tinyhippos.com>
Subject Re: Tag BlackBerry for 1.6.0rc1?
Date Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:54:29 GMT
On another note, I might have a branch locally here where I am converting
the tests to jasmine  ...... just saying ;)

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Gord Tanner <gord@tinyhippos.com> wrote:

> I pushed my changes for network for you (did a pull request to your fork).
>  It seems ok but I don't have much context as to what was broken / not
> working on the playbook to start ;)
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
>> Man those variable test result #'s drive me nuts.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > Ahh dang. Hopefully for 1.7 then, but we're awfully close.
>> >
>> > On 3/29/12 5:55 AM, "Drew Walters" <deedubbu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>For the record, here are the mobile-spec results I received for
>> >>various OS levels while developing my branch for the cordova-js merge
>> >>(* indicates actual device, others are simulators):
>> >>
>> >>OS Level        Model      Result
>> >>--------------        ---------     ----------
>> >> 5.0.0.713        9550       698-736
>> >> 6.0.0.246        9800       760-776
>> >>*6.0.0.600        9800       763-789
>> >> 7.0.0.540        9810       761-776
>> >> 7.1.0.130        9860       763-776
>> >>
>> >>Failures were reviewed to confirm they were expected failures that
>> >>pre-existed the cordova-js merge (compass, media, storage, etc.).
>> >>There are more passing/executed now then before the cordova-js merge
>> >>but this is mainly due to API's existing (compass, media, etc.) which
>> >>did not before, even though those API's have no native implementation
>> >>behind them.
>> >>
>> >>On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Drew Walters <deedubbu@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> Correct. I'm not committing the Cordova-js blackberry merge until we
>> >>>have
>> >>> playbook at a state that matches 1.5.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mar 28, 2012 7:47 PM, <gtanner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I know he mentioned that blackberry was fine but playbook still
>> needs a
>> >>>> little work.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have a few commits to playbook locally but still feels a little
>> off.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Gord
>> >>>> ------Original Message------
>> >>>> From: Tim Kim
>> >>>> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>> ReplyTo: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>> Subject: Re: Tag BlackBerry for 1.6.0rc1?
>> >>>> Sent: Mar 28, 2012 8:34 PM
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > If so: dude. Rad. MERGE THAT SHIZZLE IN AND TAG RC1!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm afraid I cannot just yet - I cannot commit so ya. Also, I think
>> I'd
>> >>>> like to know what Drew thinks because it's pretty much all of his
>> >>>>commits.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gord Tanner
> Senior Developer / Code Poet
> tinyHippos Inc.
> @tinyhippos
>
>


-- 
Gord Tanner
Senior Developer / Code Poet
tinyHippos Inc.
@tinyhippos

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message