Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 118579DFD for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14881 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 01:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14776 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 01:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14765 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2012 01:55:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:55:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.21] (HELO exprod6og108.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:55:13 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTzxh6+oSt7VzXt/thCyo+ao8YJGxEjUj@postini.com; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:53 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q1G1so2d023852 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q1G1snPm010096 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:49 -0800 Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%12]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:50 -0800 From: Filip Maj To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:54:44 -0800 Subject: Re: [Android] Removing DroidDB storage shim, removing Android 3.0 support Thread-Topic: [Android] Removing DroidDB storage shim, removing Android 3.0 support Thread-Index: AczsTfa8RIbbF8M3QXa5/7B5YTYT2w== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This makes perfect sense for me and shaves off a bunch of code from the repo. +1 On 12-02-15 3:27 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >Hey > >Since we're not supporting Android 1.5 and 1.6 anymore, I don't see the >need to have the DroidDB shim. I understand it was for Android 3.0 >support, but since Android 3.0 has been upgraded into virtual obsolence >I'm >thinking we should cut support for it as well on the tablet side and have >our baseline be Android 3.1 for Android Tablet support. That way we can >get rid of the DroidDB shim and not have to patch for WebSQL. > >http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html > >Is everyone cool with removing support for Android 3.0? There are far less >people using it than there are Android 1.5 devices out there, and I don't >see this number ever increasing. > >Joe