Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAO_65gwCvmQpCqroN4qYn4TOExiUPbw+-hMjjjr-tnkhoT5UqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAO_65gwCvmQpCqroN4qYn4TOExiUPbw+-hMjjjr-tnkhoT5UqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:26:39 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAOFYJNZiSwph22mLTyO5Q_i1_fyEo5j5uVrzz6-Zt8VVdXDWAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apache License swap for BlackBerry
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Drew Walters <deedubbu@gmail.com> wrote:
> - There are a couple of instances in the code (from Playbook
> implementation) for a copyright of RIM. =A0Has RIM agreed to removal
> of their copyright or does that need to be maintained in the source?

Sounds like a case of http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party

> - The StringUtils.java [1] file was apparently based on a BlackBerry
> knowledge base article [2] as noted in the file header. =A0Its not clear =
to
> me whether I need to include information in the LICENSE or NOTICE file fo=
r
> this.

Do we know the license of that code? If not, it would be good to
clarify whether it's OK for us to redistribute it. Alternatively I'm
sure there are plenty of other sources of similar functionality.

> - The sample project provides ant-contrib.jar which is used to build the
> project and includes the license (Apache 1.1) for it in the same director=
y.
> =A0I've added the required text to the NOTICE file, and have also added t=
he
> license to the top level LICENSE.

OK, sounds good.

> - The sample project also includes a copy of Douglas Crockford's json2.js
> [3] which is needed on BlackBerry OS 5 devices. =A0The file states it is =
in
> the public domain. =A0I've added what appears to be the license to the to=
p
> level LICENSE file.

OK.

Did you already push these changes to the repository on git-wip-us?

BR,

Jukka Zitting