Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5149A9CC3 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 622 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 17:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 597 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 17:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 587 invoked by uid 99); 29 Feb 2012 17:13:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simon.macdonald@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:13:23 +0000 Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so5127862pbb.6 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:13:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of simon.macdonald@gmail.com designates 10.68.129.137 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.129.137; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of simon.macdonald@gmail.com designates 10.68.129.137 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=simon.macdonald@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=simon.macdonald@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.129.137]) by 10.68.129.137 with SMTP id nw9mr9024822pbb.73.1330535582468 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:13:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SfBDxPAVQ6FF1/8QX7o+gzl4xeE1ozSjl1pOrdXOXTk=; b=oJQzVC+BS/ePmNVrmIqdDjorcTWDyEzYbro83B0o0fAC6lM5U+kk5qj6qoK5um9NXr XNeQ7FLQpvo3zVq78I8FWzP8bkVk22akqYuudtQiNADAoNu4I2AGl6jWs2bjymWoz1xh 5PItdZg//DTBK/WqfjTAdFIvD672Czc8TZhAY= Received: by 10.68.129.137 with SMTP id nw9mr7601235pbb.73.1330535582228; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:13:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.10.170 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Simon MacDonald Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:12:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Android] Removing DroidDB storage shim, removing Android 3.0 support To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yeah, I think it is a security exception in Android 4. Apparently, Google doesn't want WebView's using DB's. Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > Dang=C5=A0 I'm a fan of code-shaving. > > On 2/29/12 8:42 AM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote: > >>-1 >> >>There is a bug in Android 4.0.3 that requires the shim to be there or >>WebSql DB's won't work. Bryce has the details. >> >>Simon Mac Donald >>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> >>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>> This makes perfect sense for me and shaves off a bunch of code from the >>> repo. +1 >>> >>> On 12-02-15 3:27 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >>> >>>>Hey >>>> >>>>Since we're not supporting Android 1.5 and 1.6 anymore, I don't see the >>>>need to have the DroidDB shim. =C2=A0I understand it was for Android 3.= 0 >>>>support, but since Android 3.0 has been upgraded into virtual obsolence >>>>I'm >>>>thinking we should cut support for it as well on the tablet side and >>>>have >>>>our baseline be Android 3.1 for Android Tablet support. =C2=A0That way = we can >>>>get rid of the DroidDB shim and not have to patch for WebSQL. >>>> >>>>http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html >>>> >>>>Is everyone cool with removing support for Android 3.0? There are far >>>>less >>>>people using it than there are Android 1.5 devices out there, and I >>>>don't >>>>see this number ever increasing. >>>> >>>>Joe >>> >