Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C081B9874 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81742 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2012 17:30:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81702 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2012 17:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81692 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2012 17:30:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:30:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pmuellr@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:30:31 +0000 Received: by iaby12 with SMTP id y12so8330512iab.6 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pmuellr@gmail.com designates 10.42.188.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.188.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pmuellr@gmail.com designates 10.42.188.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pmuellr@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pmuellr@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.188.74]) by 10.42.188.74 with SMTP id cz10mr22875893icb.12.1329759010725 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h1bDlb3CR6pFf8n0Mmrzmk047KMmCVCniCc5mlTVN/E=; b=BFwNzYQLB6mY1md8kXqZjmlIbGIpq4FfPqlj8DiLt8gZJlI7klO2o7yRhGMuV2wJ9l TOn508bh+fJBjH/sljIXb5OX0qtoEYDmjX7cghgvAVeM3usGJJxkMFN5yOiHDT4fV1fR mss+QaDnVnbhJQlvHTmccFi0A/EHwBAGok3Rw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.188.74 with SMTP id cz10mr18268732icb.12.1329759010687; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.80.73 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:30:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Changes to File API From: Patrick Mueller To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30207546780a9104b968a51e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30207546780a9104b968a51e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:57, Dave Johnson wrote: > Yah I think that makes sense. We can even remove the old one when we hit a > major release. > It's not clear what the lifetime of such "versioned spec'd APIs from somewhere" should be. While it seems that we would certainly "drop support" for "old" versions of spec impls, not sure that we'd want to remove them entirely. Maybe "old versions" require a bit more work to "add" to your project - you have to point to a repo with a version-specifc URL or something, rather than just run a simpel command which does an "add the File API plugin". -- Patrick Mueller http://muellerware.org --20cf30207546780a9104b968a51e--