Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 170B0BA85 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51301 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 18:31:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51212 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 18:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51204 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2012 18:31:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:31:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:56 +0000 Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so5976949wgb.0 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:30:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=FaWxEhYuPOgwehZ705F+6XPg37BXksR276HrNjoPwWU=; b=bXEQjFREslyWCAAAUfmJZ5LJMomYb6B9lNCUFUkrLE6R7eXXE6mobz7sSBN0T14MaP 2JTvmvrqr1+x40NhBLd/ahozDcICH/3wzIwmSA8GOBnYj/aAVr5dn0FuP4qwvvFOAE0d FVkmwfxWWPCXa8Hq1JgT3s5B0Dry8d0pgKX+c= Received: by 10.181.11.163 with SMTP id ej3mr22299041wid.4.1326738636309; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:30:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.102.66 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:30:15 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [86.153.90.198] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ross Gardler Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Your coding practices and documentation are not done well. To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16 January 2012 18:18, Filip Maj wrote: > >>Fil, >> >>Would you explain why fair governance and project neutrality depends upon >>Apache infrastructure? > > Fair governance and neutrality don't rely on any specific infrastructure > (be it Apache or GitHub), rather, the entity that owns the code in the > first place, and the processes that are followed by everyone to > collaborate on a project decide that. Apache is a not-for-profit > foundation that owns the code, Actually the ASF does not own the code, the individual contributors do. The ASF just has a licence to redistribute the code and the copyright in the collective work (as opposed to individual contributions). This doesn't change what you say, it just reinforces it further. Ross -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com