Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41733920F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86554 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 19:15:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86534 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 19:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86521 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2012 19:15:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:15:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:15:09 +0000 Received: by ggno1 with SMTP id o1so556670ggn.6 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:14:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iXEIKAtmbbUzozWjfw9ycNnm0sZ1S5OcLEQuKoo1pLE=; b=rEVTHJw1JyXU40meML6b0mZXd2zVVZPygF5ogkLcKoqzEAG3zT1r8HXNTKXT44eOt4 S59eFifxa/Ddz3NiM3B9mx9jayPO2aNdx6+iBzEfn+KrEcalAxOk1g7PDVACgxkH3MhF dzWzNaemdCBSm+E8NZKiU1rYhRSgEIBTO/pSc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.135.1 with SMTP id po1mr175998igb.26.1326309288519; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:14:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.94.198 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:14:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:14:48 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vZ-P_YznuX00xrbDbkKzgKiacb4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Separation of the PhoneGap view in iOS From: Brian LeRoux To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes --- its something we plan on scheduling officially. From my perspective, the priority should be phonegap-js tho. On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > Nice! I guess this means the other implementations should look to see if a > similar sort of pattern is available? BlackBerry et al ? > > On 12-01-11 10:45 AM, "Shazron" wrote: > >>Completed - will be merged in to the core: >>https://github.com/cordova/cordova-ios/pull/5 >