incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Steve Gill as committer
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:09:40 GMT
Yeah, thought that said this community is very mature/respectful. I
trust our ppl to be appropriate.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> Private discussion to bring up any negative concerns leading to a public
> vote assuming the private discussion is favourable seems like a pretty
> safe approach to me.
>
> On 12-01-31 1:46 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>> Please indicate your vote add Steve (stevengill97 at gmail.com) as a
>>>committer.
>>
>>A bit late, but still enthusiastic +1!
>>
>>PS. There's traditionally been two approaches to committer votes
>>within Apache: One says that a committer vote should be conducted in
>>public on the dev@ list, as that can be a great source of morale boost
>>(+1s just keep piling in!). The other prefers to hold the vote on the
>>private (P)PMC list, as that makes it easier bring up possible
>>concerns ("his patches are always broken", etc.) and other sensitive
>>issues without embarrassing anyone in public. The collective
>>experience so far tends to favor making such personnel decisions in
>>private, or at least asking for any concerns in private before
>>starting a public committer vote. What approach do you think will work
>>best for Cordova?
>>
>>BR,
>>
>>Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
View raw message