Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2551C9FC1 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42434 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2011 00:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42349 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2011 00:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42341 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2011 00:58:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:58:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.65.73.34] (HELO mhs060cnc.rim.net) (208.65.73.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:58:39 +0000 X-AuditID: 0a41282f-b7f4f6d000000b99-91-4ee94629bcc4 Received: from XHT108CNC.rim.net (xht108cnc.rim.net [10.65.22.54]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mhs060cnc.rim.net (SBG) with SMTP id 01.25.02969.92649EE4; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:58:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from XCH103CNC.rim.net ([fe80::bcd3:ebc9:be01:581d]) by XHT108CNC.rim.net ([fe80::5ccc:ad5f:1697:fdbb%11]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:58:17 -0500 From: Ken Wallis To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:58:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Callback CCLA questions Thread-Topic: Callback CCLA questions Thread-Index: Acy6wXJkziEApR68QgalPvKC0DzdbQAAy7Yc Message-ID: <2225EEC9B3F7064AA3BDC6A62F70AAAE280222ECFC@XCH103CNC.rim.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5Shmpqvp9tLP4M5hI4s7LbPZHRg9Zi3b yhTAGNXAaJOYl5dfkliSqpCSWpxsq+STmp6YoxBQlFmWmFyp4JJZnJyTmJmbWqSkkJliq2Si pFCQk5icmpuaV2KrlFhQkJqXomTHpYABbIDKMvMUUvOS81My89JtlTyD/XUtLEwtdQ2V7HSR QMI/7oxzd3axFvzlqNhymLWBcSl7FyMnh4SAicTkpuNsELaYxIV764FsLg4hgR4miZMTPjND OIsZJXbe/cUCUsUmoCQx8XkDK4gtIuAtsffNdDCbRUBVYu6a52CThAVUJH5d28cMUaMqcbJn HlS9kcSuiXvA4rwCXhLTTp1nArE5BbQkbr+dDtbLCHTF91NrwOLMAuISt57MZ4K4TkBiyZ7z zBC2qMTLx/9YIepFJe60r2eEqNeTuDF1ChuErS2xbOFrqF2CEidnPmGZwCgyC8nYWUhaZiFp mYWkZQEjyypGwdyMYgMzg+S8ZL2izFy9vNSSTYzgGNfQ38HYt1frEKMAB6MSD+83+5d+QqyJ ZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4u/a+8BPiTUmsrEotyo8vKs1JLT7EaAEMrYnMUtzJ+cD0k1cSb2xggMJR EufVVL/nJySQDkww2ampBalFMK1MHJxSDYwZLxZecrV3NKoNmnm67bnvB0fWDKmP72N+RH+6 9+jfgcA/B6PEbN+5Pdq0eL9DrUWvUTrz3grzV8sCBWe8an4cz7Tz8MWZHc58c7Rnh1tfnWg9 9eVHWVlhkzMLFgiWlU/m53r6Sfxt6NrWEJXriRKrrzNvzI0+3J/c4y1/bateif5i/eqyu5lK LMUZiYZazEXFiQBalZexCgMAAA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Many companies (cough, eg. Rim) include in their employment contract that al= l work done by an employee, unless specifically excluded, is owned by the co= mpany. In those scenarios, the individual usually can't sign an ICLA as it= is not applicable. This is often a point of contention in many open source= projects. It would be good to clarify the Apache stance, as for example, G= ord and I have NOT signed/submitted ICLA's. ----- Original Message ----- From: Filip Maj [mailto:fil@adobe.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 07:35 PM=0A= To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Callback CCLA questions >Two questions: > >1. If a contributor's corporation has submitted a CCLA, does the >contributor have to sign an iCLA? (my hunch is no) Pretty sure it's a YES - just like us, we had to submit both. >2. How do I verify that a corporation has submitted their CCLA so I >can merge in a patch? There was a link floating around somewhere earlier... Check the mailing list archives? > >For reference, see: >https://github.com/callback/callback-ios/pull/36 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential infor= mation, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-c= lient or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information.= Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is= prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immedia= tely reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use,= dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by uninte= nded recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.