incubator-callback-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: 1.3 Release
Date Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:44:08 GMT
we need to be consistent on tag naming when we automate release building


On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> Windows Phone has been tagged
> https://github.com/callback/callback-windows-phone/tags
> However, It is tagged 1.3.rc1
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> + ... 1 ?
>>
>> On 11-12-01 1:11 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Do we need to vote on this? Sorry couldn't resist.
>> >
>> >Simon Mac Donald
>> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Michael Brooks
>> ><michael@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Simon - I agree. I really like a release schedule that uses release
>> >> candidates and reserves a few days for solid testing. I appreciate you
>> >> suggesting it for 1.3.0!
>> >>
>> >> Ken - There's a JIRA and GitHub ticket for the issue, so we can move the
>> >> conversation there. I could use some help testing it once the patch is
>> >>in
>> >> place.
>> >>
>> >> Michael
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Simon MacDonald
>> >> <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have no problem with the change of tag name or you getting code into
>> >> the
>> >> > release by the 12th. I'm just thinking we need to leave a few days
>> >>13-15
>> >> to
>> >> > do some testing and make sure we haven't broken anything.
>> >> >
>> >> > Simon Mac Donald
>> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Michael Brooks
>> >><michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>> >> > >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > I like it Simon.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'd suggest tagging as "1.3.0rc1" instead of "1.3.0_rc1"
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I would like to squeak in OS X support for BlackBerry. Should
I have
>> >> this
>> >> > > completed by Monday December 5th or Monday December 12th?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Michael
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Simon MacDonald
>> >> > > <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Hey all,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > For the upcoming 1.3 release can we throw down a few dates?
Our
>> >>last
>> >> > > > release, 1.2, was tagged and released the same day. I can't
say
>> >>for
>> >> > > certain
>> >> > > > but I'm guessing the rush was to get it out before the Adobe
>> >> > announcement
>> >> > > > but we are lucky we didn't have major problems with that
release
>> >>as
>> >> we
>> >> > > were
>> >> > > > a bit light on end to end testing.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Since we are thinking about releasing 1.3 on December 16th
I
>> >>thought
>> >> > I'd
>> >> > > > work back a bit to identify some milestones.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Dec 5th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc1
>> >> > > > Dec 12th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc2 and implement a code
freeze
>> >> > > > Dec 13th - Dec 14th - testing, testing, testing
>> >> > > > Dec 15th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0
>> >> > > > Dec 16th - package and release PhoneGap 1.3
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Basically we shouldn't be adding new code the week of the
12th
>> >>unless
>> >> > we
>> >> > > > have broken something that we discover doing regression testing.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > These are only suggestions folks but what do you think about
a
>> >>little
>> >> > > more
>> >> > > > process this time around?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Simon Mac Donald
>> >> > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message