Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A275675DC for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69875 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2011 21:13:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69849 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2011 21:13:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69841 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2011 21:13:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:13:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of purplecabbage@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:13:43 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so184704vwe.6 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:13:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tt4WvK7NCr3b186TFjsxTe+3lcGqltmuFQPAipmVIzg=; b=UD/g/uPSJSkk4TwXpOw44PV4H8GFkFjaK3udlXMCq9tLIKIAPlBHZQ72/c/Qp65QW2 rMNZkd9uweaxOoIvhya3lpCI3B0HDBkpnWUyP9n06a6JLNnv9qDulI5ZEGVJzVyI7K08 QoGiE6tvqkTgzy/Rg1oHfAwkVgrS2I9iW57ik= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.94.18 with SMTP id cy18mr1415590vdb.24.1320182002533; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.234 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:13:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:13:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x From: Jesse To: phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307cff764cc39404b0b2d3c4 --20cf307cff764cc39404b0b2d3c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable WP7 has been tagged 1.2.0 https://github.com/callback/callback-windows-phone On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Michael Brooks wro= te: > Tagged callback-docs > > On Monday, 31 October, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > +1 updating Device.java at the least. > > We probably should update the others=85 do we have documentation in place > that details the upgrade process? If we update the versions of the > elements et al then developers will need to update their config > xmls each time as well=85. > > From: Drew Walters > >> > Reply-To: "phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com< > mailto:phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com >" < > phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com > >> > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:25:17 -0700 > To: "phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com>" > > >> > Cc: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org< > mailto:callback-dev@incubator.apache.org>" > mailto:callback-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x > > I noticed the previous BlackBerry move from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 only updated > the VERSION file: > > > https://github.com/callback/callback-blackberry/commit/8caf6193b2b4ed9b59= e6bce6eca79777e8582d21 > > whereas previously we were updating Device.java, library.xml and > config.xml: > > > https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-blackberry-webworks/commit/f42a61c2d= 1884b45fe00eb754e2657b20b3ed272 > > Was this intentional or were some changes missed? I could understand not > updating library.xml and config.xml because it minimizes impact to > application developers but Device.java should be updated with proper > version. > > Thoughts? I can make changes if responses are quick otherwise I will be > passing out candy :-) > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Steve mailto:steve.gill@nitobi.com >> wrote: > Hey guys, > > If everyone is ready, I was hoping you guys could tag your repos 1.2.0. I > can package it up and ship it today. > > Cheers, > -Steve > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux mailto:b@brian.io >> wrote: > > I think Brian is referring to a phonegap release from Nitobi, not a > Callback release from the Incubator. Sort of "flush the queue" kind of > stuff before starting to work 100% within the ASF. Is that the case? > > > precisely so > > > > -- > -Steve Gill > Nitobi Software > www.nitobi.com > http://twitter.com/#!/stevesgill > > > --20cf307cff764cc39404b0b2d3c4--