Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 871107FA6 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98138 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2011 04:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98118 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2011 04:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98110 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2011 04:07:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pmuellr@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:07:31 +0000 Received: by bkbzs2 with SMTP id zs2so5799401bkb.6 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:07:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XFt0bac9iwgBmZGy0FySRKTn8aXTY2I1DFlXgN9KIvY=; b=N8v/10V84B023t5EBdhvmfvtNUT4kPw4AskTyxwgBA+xIwlcuaNzm+XhGOQAfVgxay db9R/9NqqQbjqsIzdZMZgH8hj7cIVXPs2y7aF+aUD6oCV2ExvrxWbdrAzxFw6x2xNYVU c+C51fK+FHIQog7iaqpu2qDmShw/vsh8dbm/Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.127.68 with SMTP id gz4mr12560572bkc.17.1321848430973; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.132.4 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:07:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:07:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unified phonegap javascript layer incorperating modules / plugins From: Patrick Mueller To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 15:24, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Here's the big question: *should* authors of plugins be forced into a > module system? Yes. None of the module systems add that much overhead that it will become somehow "expensive" to make a plugin modulized. Trying to deal with plugins, some of which are modules, and some of which are wads of js, is likely to be not much fun. -- Patrick Mueller http://muellerware.org