Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E750950D for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89094 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89083 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89075 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2011 21:36:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:36:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of steveng@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.189] (HELO exprod6og105.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:36:19 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:35:59 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p9VLYJGh027138; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p9VLZtLV007741; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:35:54 -0700 From: Steven Gill To: "phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com" CC: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:35:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x Thread-Topic: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x Thread-Index: AcyYFRGHLK+DXNSjR+2kOdgg8mC2Pw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CAD4629A487Astevengadobecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_CAD4629A487Astevengadobecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, I think Mike tagged BB last time and must have missed it. If you coul= d tag it that would be great! -Steve From: Drew Walters > Reply-To: "phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com" > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:25:17 -0700 To: "phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com" <= phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com> Cc: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" > Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x I noticed the previous BlackBerry move from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 only updated the= VERSION file: https://github.com/callback/callback-blackberry/commit/8caf6193b2b4ed9b59e6= bce6eca79777e8582d21 whereas previously we were updating Device.java, library.xml and config.xml= : https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-blackberry-webworks/commit/f42a61c2d18= 84b45fe00eb754e2657b20b3ed272 Was this intentional or were some changes missed? I could understand not u= pdating library.xml and config.xml because it minimizes impact to applicati= on developers but Device.java should be updated with proper version. Thoughts? I can make changes if responses are quick otherwise I will be pa= ssing out candy :-) On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Steve > wrote: Hey guys, If everyone is ready, I was hoping you guys could tag your repos 1.2.0. I c= an package it up and ship it today. Cheers, -Steve On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux > wrote: > I think Brian is referring to a phonegap release from Nitobi, not a Callb= ack release from the Incubator. Sort of "flush the queue" kind of stuff bef= ore starting to work 100% within the ASF. Is that the case? precisely so -- -Steve Gill Nitobi Software www.nitobi.com http://twitter.com/#!/stevesgill --_000_CAD4629A487Astevengadobecom_--