incubator-bval-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: An interesting post about validating collections
Date Fri, 07 May 2010 14:19:38 GMT
we are currently discussing it in the eg.
maybe we should just wait for [1].

regards,
gerhard

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/type-annotations/

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

2010/5/7 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> I honestly think this goes into the wrong direction.
> This is business logic, and if we start to provide annotations for all
> those kinds of problems, it will end up getting terribly complicated.
>
> I'd prefer to keep it simple and stupid.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> >
> >Von: Carlos Vara <bashflyng@gmail.com>
> >An: bval-user@incubator.apache.org
> >Gesendet: Freitag, den 7. Mai 2010, 10:57:11 Uhr
> >Betreff: An interesting post about validating collections
> >
> >http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/AValidationStickler
> >
> >Currently as an user, I was solving this by writing custom validators,
> which it seems is no more of a hack than the other proposed solutions
> (except the one that implies waiting for JDK7 to hopefully implement
> JSR-308).
> >
> >Any of you guys have an idea of how we could implement it?
> >
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message