incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: blur-console tagmanager.js
Date Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:51:35 GMT
Chris is the:

blur-console/src/main/webapp/less/selectivity-full.css

Suppose to be Apache licensed?  Meaning is it something we developed?  Or
should it MIT?  Rat is failing on blur-console because of it.

Aaron

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Chris!
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just pushed up a commit that replaces tagmanager.js with selectivity.js
>> (MIT license).  I've removed all traces of tagmanager and updated the
>> LICENSE file.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:20 PM Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Garrett, thanks for reference, however, the existing functionality
>> doesn't
>> > actually do anything in regards to building the queries for faceting.
>> It's
>> > purely a UI control to build up the pieces to facet on in a tagging like
>> > interface.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM Garrett Barton <
>> garrett.barton@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Facetjs? Theres two out there with that name though.
>> >> On Jul 20, 2015 8:47 AM, "Chris Rohr" <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I can help take a look at an alternative.  It is used for building
up
>> >> > facets in the search portion of the console.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Justin noticed in our RC that we include tagmanager.js, which
is
>> >> > > category B.  I'm not sure what role it plays in the console -
>> anyone
>> >> > > know of an alternative to it's functionality under an acceptable
>> >> > > license?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > --tim
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> > > From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
>> >> > > Date: Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM
>> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.4-incubating RC1
>> >> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) until the MPL issue can be resolved
/
>> >> > > explained, other issues can be fixed next release. For the MPL
>> issue
>> >> > > it may be that "For small amounts of source that is directly
>> consumed
>> >> > > by the ASF product at runtime in source form” may apply. [2]
>> >> > >
>> >> > > For the source release I checked:
>> >> > > - filename contains incubating
>> >> > > - signatures and hashes good
>> >> > > - DISCLAIMER exists
>> >> > > - LICENSE has minor issues + MPL issue [2]
>> >> > > - NOTICE good
>> >> > > - Some unexpected binaries in source (see below)
>> >> > > - All source file have headers
>> >> > > - Can compile form source?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > LiCENSE is missing:
>> >> > >  - MIT licensed normalize.css (see
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/public/css/blurconsole.css
>> >> > > +
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/bootstrap/less/normalize.less)
>> >> > > - MIT/BSD licensed polyfill (see
>> ./docs/resources/js/respond.min.js)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There is an issue with
>> >> > > ./blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/tagmanager/tagmanager.js as
>> this
>> >> > > is MPL licensed [2] which is weak copy left and considered a
>> category
>> >> > > B license. In this case it looks like it isn’t been handled
>> correctly
>> >> > > as it being included in source not binary form. I’m not sure
how
>> this
>> >> > > should be handled given there is no compiled JS form.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There are a couple of test files that contain compiled code, can
>> this
>> >> > > be produced via the build process?
>> >> > >
>> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test1/test1.jar
>> >> > >
>> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test2/test2.jar
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Something a little odd that caught my eye is all of the
>> >> > > ./distribution/src/main/resources-hadoop1/notices/*.jar.src files.
>> Is
>> >> > > there any reason for these files to be in the source release?
It
>> look
>> >> > > that they are used to generate the binary NOTICE file?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > For the binary release you may want to check the LICENSE as it
is
>> >> > > identical to the source release [3]. For the binary NOTICE file
a
>> >> > > minor issue in that there is no need to repeat "This product
>> includes
>> >> > > software developed by The Apache Software Foundation “ [4].
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Re compiling from source some instructions in the README would
be
>> >> > > helpful as it seems a mvn install in the top directory may not
do
>> what
>> >> > > is expected. (As far as I can see it seems to be doing a rat check
>> and
>> >> > > nothing else?)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Justin
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>> >> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>> >> > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
>> >> > > 4.
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
>> >> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message