incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: blur-console tagmanager.js
Date Sun, 02 Aug 2015 18:17:33 GMT
Ok thanks.

On Sunday, August 2, 2015, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Same with the selectivity-full.js
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I added it to the LICENSE file but forgot the rat exclusions.  It
> > is MIT licensed.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:51 PM Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> Chris is the:
> >>
> >> blur-console/src/main/webapp/less/selectivity-full.css
> >>
> >> Suppose to be Apache licensed?  Meaning is it something we developed?
> Or
> >> should it MIT?  Rat is failing on blur-console because of it.
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks Chris!
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I just pushed up a commit that replaces tagmanager.js with
> >> selectivity.js
> >> >> (MIT license).  I've removed all traces of tagmanager and updated the
> >> >> LICENSE file.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:20 PM Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Garrett, thanks for reference, however, the existing functionality
> >> >> doesn't
> >> >> > actually do anything in regards to building the queries for
> faceting.
> >> >> It's
> >> >> > purely a UI control to build up the pieces to facet on in a tagging
> >> like
> >> >> > interface.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM Garrett Barton <
> >> >> garrett.barton@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Facetjs? Theres two out there with that name though.
> >> >> >> On Jul 20, 2015 8:47 AM, "Chris Rohr" <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > I can help take a look at an alternative.  It is used
for
> >> building up
> >> >> >> > facets in the search portion of the console.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM Tim Williams <
> >> williamstw@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > > Justin noticed in our RC that we include tagmanager.js,
which
> is
> >> >> >> > > category B.  I'm not sure what role it plays in
the console -
> >> >> anyone
> >> >> >> > > know of an alternative to it's functionality under
an
> acceptable
> >> >> >> > > license?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Thanks,
> >> >> >> > > --tim
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> >> >> > > From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
<javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> > > Date: Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM
> >> >> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.4-incubating
RC1
> >> >> >> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Hi,
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) until the MPL issue
can be
> resolved
> >> /
> >> >> >> > > explained, other issues can be fixed next release.
For the MPL
> >> >> issue
> >> >> >> > > it may be that "For small amounts of source that
is directly
> >> >> consumed
> >> >> >> > > by the ASF product at runtime in source form”
may apply. [2]
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > For the source release I checked:
> >> >> >> > > - filename contains incubating
> >> >> >> > > - signatures and hashes good
> >> >> >> > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> >> >> >> > > - LICENSE has minor issues + MPL issue [2]
> >> >> >> > > - NOTICE good
> >> >> >> > > - Some unexpected binaries in source (see below)
> >> >> >> > > - All source file have headers
> >> >> >> > > - Can compile form source?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > LiCENSE is missing:
> >> >> >> > >  - MIT licensed normalize.css (see
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/public/css/blurconsole.css
> >> >> >> > > +
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/bootstrap/less/normalize.less)
> >> >> >> > > - MIT/BSD licensed polyfill (see
> >> >> ./docs/resources/js/respond.min.js)
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > There is an issue with
> >> >> >> > > ./blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/tagmanager/tagmanager.js
> as
> >> >> this
> >> >> >> > > is MPL licensed [2] which is weak copy left and
considered a
> >> >> category
> >> >> >> > > B license. In this case it looks like it isn’t
been handled
> >> >> correctly
> >> >> >> > > as it being included in source not binary form.
I’m not sure
> how
> >> >> this
> >> >> >> > > should be handled given there is no compiled JS
form.
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > There are a couple of test files that contain compiled
code,
> can
> >> >> this
> >> >> >> > > be produced via the build process?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >>
> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test1/test1.jar
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >>
> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test2/test2.jar
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Something a little odd that caught my eye is all
of the
> >> >> >> > > ./distribution/src/main/resources-hadoop1/notices/*.jar.src
> >> files.
> >> >> Is
> >> >> >> > > there any reason for these files to be in the source
release?
> It
> >> >> look
> >> >> >> > > that they are used to generate the binary NOTICE
file?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > For the binary release you may want to check the
LICENSE as it
> >> is
> >> >> >> > > identical to the source release [3]. For the binary
NOTICE
> file
> >> a
> >> >> >> > > minor issue in that there is no need to repeat "This
product
> >> >> includes
> >> >> >> > > software developed by The Apache Software Foundation
“ [4].
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Re compiling from source some instructions in the
README would
> >> be
> >> >> >> > > helpful as it seems a mvn install in the top directory
may not
> >> do
> >> >> what
> >> >> >> > > is expected. (As far as I can see it seems to be
doing a rat
> >> check
> >> >> and
> >> >> >> > > nothing else?)
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Thanks,
> >> >> >> > > Justin
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> >> >> >> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> >> >> >> > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
> >> >> >> > > 4.
> >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >> >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message