incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Rohr <rohr.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: blur-console tagmanager.js
Date Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:40:30 GMT
I just pushed up a commit that replaces tagmanager.js with selectivity.js
(MIT license).  I've removed all traces of tagmanager and updated the
LICENSE file.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:20 PM Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Garrett, thanks for reference, however, the existing functionality doesn't
> actually do anything in regards to building the queries for faceting.  It's
> purely a UI control to build up the pieces to facet on in a tagging like
> interface.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM Garrett Barton <garrett.barton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Facetjs? Theres two out there with that name though.
>> On Jul 20, 2015 8:47 AM, "Chris Rohr" <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I can help take a look at an alternative.  It is used for building up
>> > facets in the search portion of the console.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Justin noticed in our RC that we include tagmanager.js, which is
>> > > category B.  I'm not sure what role it plays in the console - anyone
>> > > know of an alternative to it's functionality under an acceptable
>> > > license?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > --tim
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > > From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
>> > > Date: Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.4-incubating RC1
>> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) until the MPL issue can be resolved /
>> > > explained, other issues can be fixed next release. For the MPL issue
>> > > it may be that "For small amounts of source that is directly consumed
>> > > by the ASF product at runtime in source form” may apply. [2]
>> > >
>> > > For the source release I checked:
>> > > - filename contains incubating
>> > > - signatures and hashes good
>> > > - DISCLAIMER exists
>> > > - LICENSE has minor issues + MPL issue [2]
>> > > - NOTICE good
>> > > - Some unexpected binaries in source (see below)
>> > > - All source file have headers
>> > > - Can compile form source?
>> > >
>> > > LiCENSE is missing:
>> > >  - MIT licensed normalize.css (see
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/public/css/blurconsole.css
>> > > +
>> > >
>> >
>> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/bootstrap/less/normalize.less)
>> > > - MIT/BSD licensed polyfill (see ./docs/resources/js/respond.min.js)
>> > >
>> > > There is an issue with
>> > > ./blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/tagmanager/tagmanager.js as this
>> > > is MPL licensed [2] which is weak copy left and considered a category
>> > > B license. In this case it looks like it isn’t been handled correctly
>> > > as it being included in source not binary form. I’m not sure how this
>> > > should be handled given there is no compiled JS form.
>> > >
>> > > There are a couple of test files that contain compiled code, can this
>> > > be produced via the build process?
>> > > ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test1/test1.jar
>> > > ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test2/test2.jar
>> > >
>> > > Something a little odd that caught my eye is all of the
>> > > ./distribution/src/main/resources-hadoop1/notices/*.jar.src files. Is
>> > > there any reason for these files to be in the source release? It look
>> > > that they are used to generate the binary NOTICE file?
>> > >
>> > > For the binary release you may want to check the LICENSE as it is
>> > > identical to the source release [3]. For the binary NOTICE file a
>> > > minor issue in that there is no need to repeat "This product includes
>> > > software developed by The Apache Software Foundation “ [4].
>> > >
>> > > Re compiling from source some instructions in the README would be
>> > > helpful as it seems a mvn install in the top directory may not do what
>> > > is expected. (As far as I can see it seems to be doing a rat check and
>> > > nothing else?)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>> > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
>> > > 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message