incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: blur-console tagmanager.js
Date Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:15:27 GMT
Thanks Chris!

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just pushed up a commit that replaces tagmanager.js with selectivity.js
> (MIT license).  I've removed all traces of tagmanager and updated the
> LICENSE file.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:20 PM Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Garrett, thanks for reference, however, the existing functionality
> doesn't
> > actually do anything in regards to building the queries for faceting.
> It's
> > purely a UI control to build up the pieces to facet on in a tagging like
> > interface.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM Garrett Barton <garrett.barton@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Facetjs? Theres two out there with that name though.
> >> On Jul 20, 2015 8:47 AM, "Chris Rohr" <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I can help take a look at an alternative.  It is used for building up
> >> > facets in the search portion of the console.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:09 PM Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Justin noticed in our RC that we include tagmanager.js, which is
> >> > > category B.  I'm not sure what role it plays in the console - anyone
> >> > > know of an alternative to it's functionality under an acceptable
> >> > > license?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > --tim
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> > > From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> >> > > Date: Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM
> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.4-incubating RC1
> >> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) until the MPL issue can be resolved
/
> >> > > explained, other issues can be fixed next release. For the MPL issue
> >> > > it may be that "For small amounts of source that is directly
> consumed
> >> > > by the ASF product at runtime in source form” may apply. [2]
> >> > >
> >> > > For the source release I checked:
> >> > > - filename contains incubating
> >> > > - signatures and hashes good
> >> > > - DISCLAIMER exists
> >> > > - LICENSE has minor issues + MPL issue [2]
> >> > > - NOTICE good
> >> > > - Some unexpected binaries in source (see below)
> >> > > - All source file have headers
> >> > > - Can compile form source?
> >> > >
> >> > > LiCENSE is missing:
> >> > >  - MIT licensed normalize.css (see
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/public/css/blurconsole.css
> >> > > +
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> ./apache-blur-0.2.4-incubating-src/blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/bootstrap/less/normalize.less)
> >> > > - MIT/BSD licensed polyfill (see ./docs/resources/js/respond.min.js)
> >> > >
> >> > > There is an issue with
> >> > > ./blur-console/src/main/webapp/libs/tagmanager/tagmanager.js as this
> >> > > is MPL licensed [2] which is weak copy left and considered a
> category
> >> > > B license. In this case it looks like it isn’t been handled
> correctly
> >> > > as it being included in source not binary form. I’m not sure how
> this
> >> > > should be handled given there is no compiled JS form.
> >> > >
> >> > > There are a couple of test files that contain compiled code, can
> this
> >> > > be produced via the build process?
> >> > >
> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test1/test1.jar
> >> > >
> ./blur-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/blur/command/test2/test2.jar
> >> > >
> >> > > Something a little odd that caught my eye is all of the
> >> > > ./distribution/src/main/resources-hadoop1/notices/*.jar.src files.
> Is
> >> > > there any reason for these files to be in the source release? It
> look
> >> > > that they are used to generate the binary NOTICE file?
> >> > >
> >> > > For the binary release you may want to check the LICENSE as it is
> >> > > identical to the source release [3]. For the binary NOTICE file a
> >> > > minor issue in that there is no need to repeat "This product
> includes
> >> > > software developed by The Apache Software Foundation “ [4].
> >> > >
> >> > > Re compiling from source some instructions in the README would be
> >> > > helpful as it seems a mvn install in the top directory may not do
> what
> >> > > is expected. (As far as I can see it seems to be doing a rat check
> and
> >> > > nothing else?)
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Justin
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> >> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> >> > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
> >> > > 4.
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message