incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Rohr <rohr.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.2.4 release planning
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:24:40 GMT
We need to figure out how to fix the routing issue that came up with the
console when we downgraded Jetty from 9 to 8.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:24 AM Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are a few code updates from the merge testing that need to be
> applied. I will try to have them applied later today.
>
> On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, so we have:
> >
> > 1) pom file changes - seems like everyone is ok with this for 0.2.4,
> > so I'll make those changes in the next day or so.
> > 2) documentation - there's still a bit left on the command stuff that
> > I'll try to finish off in the next day or so; we also need to just go
> > through the rest of the documentation and make sure it's all still
> > accurate.
> > 3) ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --tim
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > I have helped them out on this issue.  It turns out that several of the
> > > thread pools were configured with too many threads.  I will check back
> > with
> > > them tomorrow to make sure that everything is still running well.
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ok, let's crash on this issue then.  Chris, do you wanna open up a
> > >> JIRA issue for it?  Any ideas how we might craft a test for it?  It
> > >> seems like it might have to be an integration test, but can you say
> > >> more about the conditions that precede it?  Any sorting? Any filters?
> > >> Large number of fields? Large number of column families?  If you can
> > >> open up a ticket, I'm wondering if we can iterate on a test until we
> > >> find the right scenario that reproduces it or maybe you don't know
> > >> enough about it quite yet?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --tim
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> > The issue that Chris has mentioned is the only blocker in my mind.
I
> > >> would
> > >> > like to resolve the merge performance issue but I agree with Tim
> that
> > >> > should not hold up the release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Aaron
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Tim,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks for starting this list.  I am cool with being the RM for
> this.
> > >> >> I just got a new computer so I'll make sure my keys are still
good
> to
> > >> >> go.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> As for remaining issues:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 1. We are having a back pressure issue under the following
> scenario:
> > >> >>     * column families are cold
> > >> >>     * concurrent queries (more than 10) are issued against the
cold
> > >> >> families
> > >> >>    This basically makes the system unusable very quickly and runs
> the
> > >> >> cluster to the point where it has to be restarted.  Aaron has
been
> > >> >> brought into the conversation to help review things on our end
as
> > >> >> well.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2. The console was updated to support SSL connections, however,
> there
> > >> >> is no way currently to actually enable ssl on Jetty through
> > >> >> configuration.  We may want to get that done prior to the release.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Current In-work console issues that would be nice to have:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 1. Facets on the search tab
> > >> >> 2. Top in the console
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Chris
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tim Williams <
> williamstw@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >> > I'd like to chart out what needs to be done to kick 0.2.4
out the
> > >> >> > door.  On core blur, I'm only aware of slow merging under
certain
> > >> >> > [extreme-ish?] conditions.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > o) I pushed a new archetype for new Commands yesterday that
has
> > some
> > >> >> > slightly funky version bug/behavior. The archetype just creates
a
> > >> >> > sample command so I think we're fine shipping with that as
is.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > o) I think we're ok shipping with the merge weirdness because
> we've
> > >> >> > been unable to hunt it down so far and it's pretty rock solid
and
> > only
> > >> >> > presents under certain circumstances.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > o) ?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Also, Chris, you still cool with being RM for this one?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks,
> > >> >> > --tim
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message