incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.2.4 release planning
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:23:31 GMT
There are a few code updates from the merge testing that need to be
applied. I will try to have them applied later today.

On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, so we have:
>
> 1) pom file changes - seems like everyone is ok with this for 0.2.4,
> so I'll make those changes in the next day or so.
> 2) documentation - there's still a bit left on the command stuff that
> I'll try to finish off in the next day or so; we also need to just go
> through the rest of the documentation and make sure it's all still
> accurate.
> 3) ?
>
> Thanks,
> --tim
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I have helped them out on this issue.  It turns out that several of the
> > thread pools were configured with too many threads.  I will check back
> with
> > them tomorrow to make sure that everything is still running well.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, let's crash on this issue then.  Chris, do you wanna open up a
> >> JIRA issue for it?  Any ideas how we might craft a test for it?  It
> >> seems like it might have to be an integration test, but can you say
> >> more about the conditions that precede it?  Any sorting? Any filters?
> >> Large number of fields? Large number of column families?  If you can
> >> open up a ticket, I'm wondering if we can iterate on a test until we
> >> find the right scenario that reproduces it or maybe you don't know
> >> enough about it quite yet?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --tim
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > The issue that Chris has mentioned is the only blocker in my mind. I
> >> would
> >> > like to resolve the merge performance issue but I agree with Tim that
> >> > should not hold up the release.
> >> >
> >> > Aaron
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tim,
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for starting this list.  I am cool with being the RM for this.
> >> >> I just got a new computer so I'll make sure my keys are still good
to
> >> >> go.
> >> >>
> >> >> As for remaining issues:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. We are having a back pressure issue under the following scenario:
> >> >>     * column families are cold
> >> >>     * concurrent queries (more than 10) are issued against the cold
> >> >> families
> >> >>    This basically makes the system unusable very quickly and runs the
> >> >> cluster to the point where it has to be restarted.  Aaron has been
> >> >> brought into the conversation to help review things on our end as
> >> >> well.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2. The console was updated to support SSL connections, however, there
> >> >> is no way currently to actually enable ssl on Jetty through
> >> >> configuration.  We may want to get that done prior to the release.
> >> >>
> >> >> Current In-work console issues that would be nice to have:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Facets on the search tab
> >> >> 2. Top in the console
> >> >>
> >> >> Chris
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> >> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> > I'd like to chart out what needs to be done to kick 0.2.4 out
the
> >> >> > door.  On core blur, I'm only aware of slow merging under certain
> >> >> > [extreme-ish?] conditions.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > o) I pushed a new archetype for new Commands yesterday that has
> some
> >> >> > slightly funky version bug/behavior. The archetype just creates
a
> >> >> > sample command so I think we're fine shipping with that as is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > o) I think we're ok shipping with the merge weirdness because
we've
> >> >> > been unable to hunt it down so far and it's pretty rock solid
and
> only
> >> >> > presents under certain circumstances.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > o) ?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Also, Chris, you still cool with being RM for this one?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > --tim
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message