incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.2.4 release planning
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:22:59 GMT
The issue that Chris has mentioned is the only blocker in my mind. I would
like to resolve the merge performance issue but I agree with Tim that
should not hold up the release.

Aaron

On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim,
>
> Thanks for starting this list.  I am cool with being the RM for this.
> I just got a new computer so I'll make sure my keys are still good to
> go.
>
> As for remaining issues:
>
> 1. We are having a back pressure issue under the following scenario:
>     * column families are cold
>     * concurrent queries (more than 10) are issued against the cold
> families
>    This basically makes the system unusable very quickly and runs the
> cluster to the point where it has to be restarted.  Aaron has been
> brought into the conversation to help review things on our end as
> well.
>
> 2. The console was updated to support SSL connections, however, there
> is no way currently to actually enable ssl on Jetty through
> configuration.  We may want to get that done prior to the release.
>
> Current In-work console issues that would be nice to have:
>
> 1. Facets on the search tab
> 2. Top in the console
>
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I'd like to chart out what needs to be done to kick 0.2.4 out the
> > door.  On core blur, I'm only aware of slow merging under certain
> > [extreme-ish?] conditions.
> >
> > o) I pushed a new archetype for new Commands yesterday that has some
> > slightly funky version bug/behavior. The archetype just creates a
> > sample command so I think we're fine shipping with that as is.
> >
> > o) I think we're ok shipping with the merge weirdness because we've
> > been unable to hunt it down so far and it's pretty rock solid and only
> > presents under certain circumstances.
> >
> > o) ?
> >
> > Also, Chris, you still cool with being RM for this one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --tim
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message