incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.3-incubating RC1
Date Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:21:36 GMT
Having the path in the LICENSE file seems like a good idea.
Are there any tools used by other apache projects to generate the license
file on release? It seems like it could be automated to avoid this
situation in the future

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Tim Williams <> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Chris Rohr <> wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > The 3 you can't find are from the original blur console, they can be
> > removed.  We will need to add the 3 MIT ones.  I can do this if you all
> > want.  What is the process?  Does this hold up the release?
> Hey Chris,
> Yes, licensing issues are blocking - it needs to get fixed before a
> release so probably fix it as soon as you can and lets roll a new
> candidate.  FWIW, the three that I noticed not being accounted for
> were a spot check, not comprehensive.  I'd do a find . -name *.js and
> just do a check against the license file with these guidelines[1] in
> mind.
> On a side note, I'd really like to go back to putting the path (e.g.
> ./blur-console/src/main/webapp/js/utils/jquery.event.gevent.js) on a
> new line under the mention in LICENSE to aid in both find things that
> should be accounted for and things that are in License but should not
> be... thoughts?
> Thanks,
> --tim
> [1] -

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message