incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colton <col...@dosarrest.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (BLUR-296) Facets are subqueries not facets
Date Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:46:03 GMT
What's going on with the proper implementation of Facets?
Has there been any progress yet?

Thanks,
     Colton

On 12/2/2013 7:05 AM, Aaron McCurry (JIRA) wrote:
>      [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836582#comment-13836582
]
>
> Aaron McCurry commented on BLUR-296:
> ------------------------------------
>
> Thanks Colton for writing this up, it's very detailed.  I believe your example above
describes what changes we need to make to the API and I agreed with you on the various flags
in the table descriptor and column definitions.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
>> Facets are subqueries not facets
>> --------------------------------
>>
>>                  Key: BLUR-296
>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-296
>>              Project: Apache Blur
>>           Issue Type: Improvement
>>           Components: Blur
>>     Affects Versions: experimental-dev, 0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.2.1
>>          Environment: N/A
>>             Reporter: Colton McInroy
>>               Labels: features
>>
>> Based on the classification of what Facets are from Lucene and other search systems,
the current implementation in Blur does not really support this functionality.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faceted_classification
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faceted_search
>> It is entirely different than anything really described in the Lucene documentation.
>> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/doc-files/userguide.html
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.1#6144)


Mime
View raw message