incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron McCurry (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BLUR-280) Make the family field optional on the Record object.
Date Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:06:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13799904#comment-13799904
] 

Aaron McCurry commented on BLUR-280:
------------------------------------

The basic use of the BaseFieldManager is to deal with mapping Column name + family to types
to know how to create fields and what analyzers to use.  Basically the family + column.name
= fieldname and we need to deal with when the family is null.  Perhaps at this point it would
be better to internally just set the family to a known value like "_default_" or something
like that.  Then we can keep things the same internally, not sure.  Let me take a look at
the code and give you some areas to focus on.

Aaron

> Make the family field optional on the Record object.
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BLUR-280
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-280
>             Project: Apache Blur
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Blur
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Aaron McCurry
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> Allow the family field in the Record object to be null (optionally set).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message