incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.0-incubating
Date Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:14:31 GMT
You need to ask a chair to run the following command on people.a.o

modify_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin --add=<user>

on your user id. After which you will have karma to admin on jenkins.

I can't do it - Doug or another mentor that has perms?

Patrick


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Patrick,
>
> Agreed.  The issue with the jdk6 master build is that the dependencies are
> not installed.  On a local machine if the libraries in the local repo under
> org/apache/blur are deleted and you cd into one of the modules (blur-core)
> and run "mvn clean test" it will fail because it can't find some other blur
> dependences.  The command that needs to be run is "mvn -am -pl blur-core
> clean test" from the root (parent pom directory).  I'm not sure how to
> modify jenkins to make happen, or if there's a way to get jenkins to just
> run the build from the root.  Either way I would be happy to tinker with it
> to get it right so that way you don't have mess with it whenever we make a
> change.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> fwiw the Blur jenkins jobs are not green. Might be good to have these
>> green as part of your release process: (not a blocker though). You can
>> see the issues here:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/job/Blur-master-jdk6/
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/job/Blur-master-jdk7/
>>
>> LMK if you need tweaks, you can also be added as a jenkins admin if
>> you want to manage these (add more, etc...) yourselves.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I am canceling the vote and working through the issues that phunt posted.
>> >  We will cut a new release once these issues are addressed.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Aaron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Agreed, I'm changing the assembly plugin to pull them in during the
>> binary
>> >> artifact creation.  Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Aaron
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > An aside - why do you need to distribute generated files in the
>> source
>> >>> > artifact? Perhaps consider not committing/including them? (only
in
>> the
>> >>> > bin)
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 I think it's best if the source release is nearly identical to a
>> clean
>> >>> checkout of the release tag, and we should avoid committing generated
>> >>> files
>> >>> unless the generating software is not easily available to all
>> developers
>> >>> (which is not great either).
>> >>>
>> >>> Doug
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message