incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release proposal
Date Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:09:25 GMT
I have started the 0.2 release, so no rush.  If needed we can do a point
release, or get to 0.3 sooner.

Aaron


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you want me to try to get the console finished before code freeze?
>
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have been reading through the release notes (I know that we will be
> > making changes to them as needed).  Should we branch for the release
> > "0.2-dev" and tag "0.2.0" so that we know what was in the release?  Or
> > should we branch each time?  So that "0.2.0" is a branch, and we branch
> > from "0.2.0" to make "0.2.1"?
> >
> > On side a note, I think that unless there is a bug fix needed for "0.2.0"
> > that we should just work toward "0.3.0" and have that release within a
> > month.  What do you all think?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Awesome thanks Chris!  And good luck!
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Chris Rohr <rohr.chris@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just commented on the Blur Console ticket with the last remaining
> items
> >>> that don't work.  I can try to fix them tonight (assuming my wife
> doesn't
> >>> go into labor).
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> That is good with me. I do have one request. Can I leave the factory
> >>> code I put in to allow for the creation of the block cache?  It's
> pretty
> >>> harmless code and has no effect on configuration.  Once I remove the v2
> >>> block cache I think we can consider a code freeze.
> >>>>
> >>>> Aaron
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 3, 2013, at 11:14 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I meant to add, I reckon this'd mean we'd pull back the block
> cache-v2
> >>>>> stuff for this release...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tuesday, September 3, 2013, Tim Williams wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've been editing HowToRelease[1] in anticipation of an upcoming
> >>>>>> release.  I'd like to propose instead that we just do the release
> and
> >>>>>> edit that with the commands/procedures that we actually perform.
The
> >>>>>> rationale is that some of preferred methods have changed (e.g.
> >>>>>> svn-based vs. p.a.o/dist) and it'd be easiest for the RM to
just
> >>>>>> update it as they go along.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are there any open issues blocking a release?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can we consider a code-freeze on master for a couple days?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If no to both, any problems with creating a release candidate
> tomorrow
> >>>>>> and letting it run 72hrs?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Or, an alternate proposal?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> --tim
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] - https://wiki.apache.org/blur/HowToRelease
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message