incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gagan Deep Juneja (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BLUR-106) Potential issue with the BlurOutputFormat and the BlurPartitioner
Date Sat, 25 May 2013 04:17:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13666960#comment-13666960
] 

Gagan Deep Juneja commented on BLUR-106:
----------------------------------------

I agree on this. Can we change key in BlurPartitioner to Text?


Regards,
Gagan
                
> Potential issue with the BlurOutputFormat and the BlurPartitioner
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BLUR-106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-106
>             Project: Apache Blur
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.1.5
>            Reporter: Aaron McCurry
>             Fix For: 0.1.5
>
>
> The current implementation of the BlurOutputFormat has a Text object as the key in the
RecordWriter.  However internally the BlurPartitioner uses the BytesWritable object, I believe
that the correct object to use is the Text object because that is the closest implementation
to the rowid in the Hadoop stack.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message