incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gagan Deep Juneja (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BLUR-64) Update to use the new SuperQueryParser
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:51:18 GMT


Gagan Deep Juneja commented on BLUR-64:

I agree with you. I have some more points to discuss.
1. There are two versions of class. one is generated through thrift which is
used at many places and another one is we created in 0.2. So which should we keep. It doesn't
impact a lot because both are having same enum definition. But need to have only one to make
2. package exists in both blur-core and blur-query modules.
Sholdn't we merge both in blur-query module only?
3. In IndexManager class I used TableContext class's create method to create cache and TableContext
object as well. I didn't understand here the use of enabling and disabling table which you
mentioned in the previous reply.

> Update to use the new SuperQueryParser
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: BLUR-64
>                 URL:
>             Project: Apache Blur
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.1.5
>            Reporter: Aaron McCurry
>             Fix For: 0.1.5
> In the 0.2-dev branch and the blur-query project there is a updated SuperQueryParser
class that should be used in place of the legacy SuperQueryParser that is found in the blur-core
> NOTE:  The blur-query project has already been merged into the 0.1.5 branch.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message