incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron McCurry (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BLUR-64) Update to use the new SuperQueryParser
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2013 02:57:15 GMT


Aaron McCurry commented on BLUR-64:

In regards to your first question. Yes we will need a reference to the tablecontext object.
Currently in 0.1.5 there is not a cache of it anywhere, we should probably create a cache
and put references to the cache in both the distributedindexserver class and the indexmanager
class (where the queryparser is used).  The cache could be as simple as a map but will need
to follow the enabling and disabling of tables. 

As for your second question I'm not sure I understand. If you are referring to the query parser
in the blur-query project the query would look like (super:<a.b:word a.c:word> +super:<d.b:word>).
The super query is no longer implied. 

Let me know what you think. Thanks!

> Update to use the new SuperQueryParser
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: BLUR-64
>                 URL:
>             Project: Apache Blur
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.1.5
>            Reporter: Aaron McCurry
>             Fix For: 0.1.5
> In the 0.2-dev branch and the blur-query project there is a updated SuperQueryParser
class that should be used in place of the legacy SuperQueryParser that is found in the blur-core
> NOTE:  The blur-query project has already been merged into the 0.1.5 branch.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message