incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Path to 0.2 - Progress report
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:37:47 GMT
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes CTR on the lucene-4.0.0 branch for committers and patches through
> jira for contributors?  Does that makes sense?  This is all new to me.
>  :)

Sounds ok. Although I mainly deal with RTC so somewhat new to me as well.

Why was CompressedFieldDataDirectory removed? Is that coming back or
some alternative in 4.0?

Patrick

>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>> Sounds good. Create a new lucene4 branch?
>>
>> I'm not yet clear on the development approach. Re the discussion on
>> the "question on commit process" thread. How will commits to this
>> branch be handled? Through jiras? CTR so no reviews before the fact?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Anyone else have an opinion on this?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:32 AM, rohit sharma <rohit0286@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 on this.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have not made as much progress as I had wanted this weekend.  I have
>>>>> decided to try and upgrade the existing code to Lucene 4.0 before
>>>>> trying to add the new API to the mix.  I really don't want to check in
>>>>> a bunch of broken code.  But if I did this might be a good opportunity
>>>>> for others to figure out how things work internally by jumping in and
>>>>> helping to port the old Lucene 3.6 code to 4.0.  I won't push any of
>>>>> my changes until we take a vote on this.  Also I will be working to
>>>>> get the code compiling again most of the day tomorrow.  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> > I am in the process on getting the code setup and ready for 0.2
on a
>>>>> > local branch.  The following version changes have been made in 0.2.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thrift went to 0.8.0
>>>>> > Lucene to 4.0.0
>>>>> > Hadoop to 1.0.3
>>>>> > ZooKeeper to 3.4.4
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Also the blur-util, blur-store, blur-thrift projects are cleaned
up
>>>>> > and compiling with unit tests passing.  The big projects that I'm
>>>>> > still working on:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > blur-core
>>>>> > blur-mapreduce
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I hope to have them in a semi-functional state ready to be committed
>>>>> > by some point tomorrow.  Just wanted to let everyone know that these
>>>>> > changes that we have been discussing for a couple weeks should find
>>>>> > it's way to master in the next day or so.  Unfortunately with all
the
>>>>> > version changes and the API changes this is going to be a big bang
>>>>> > (which I don't like), but hopefully we won't have to go through
one of
>>>>> > there again for a long time (if ever).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Aaron
>>>>>

Mime
View raw message