incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gagan Juneja <gagandeepjun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Path to 0.2 - Progress report
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:22:36 GMT
Hi Aaron,
I have fixed some compilation issues and tests in org.apache.blur.analysis
package under project blur-core. Should I create patch and give it to you?
Is there any Jira already opened  for this?


Regards,
Gagan

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:

> CompressedFieldDataDirectory will be brought back in the form of a
> extension to the appendingcodec in lucene 4. It will fit more naturally
> there.  We should and a jira issue for it's implementation.
>
> Aaron
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Yes CTR on the lucene-4.0.0 branch for committers and patches through
> >> jira for contributors?  Does that makes sense?  This is all new to me.
> >> :)
> >
> > Sounds ok. Although I mainly deal with RTC so somewhat new to me as well.
> >
> > Why was CompressedFieldDataDirectory removed? Is that coming back or
> > some alternative in 4.0?
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Sounds good. Create a new lucene4 branch?
> >>>
> >>> I'm not yet clear on the development approach. Re the discussion on
> >>> the "question on commit process" thread. How will commits to this
> >>> branch be handled? Through jiras? CTR so no reviews before the fact?
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> Anyone else have an opinion on this?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:32 AM, rohit sharma <rohit0286@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> +1 on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I have not made as much progress as I had wanted this weekend.
 I
> have
> >>>>>> decided to try and upgrade the existing code to Lucene 4.0 before
> >>>>>> trying to add the new API to the mix.  I really don't want to
check
> in
> >>>>>> a bunch of broken code.  But if I did this might be a good
> opportunity
> >>>>>> for others to figure out how things work internally by jumping
in
> and
> >>>>>> helping to port the old Lucene 3.6 code to 4.0.  I won't push
any of
> >>>>>> my changes until we take a vote on this.  Also I will be working
to
> >>>>>> get the code compiling again most of the day tomorrow.  Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Aaron
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I am in the process on getting the code setup and ready
for 0.2 on
> a
> >>>>>>> local branch.  The following version changes have been made
in 0.2.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thrift went to 0.8.0
> >>>>>>> Lucene to 4.0.0
> >>>>>>> Hadoop to 1.0.3
> >>>>>>> ZooKeeper to 3.4.4
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also the blur-util, blur-store, blur-thrift projects are
cleaned up
> >>>>>>> and compiling with unit tests passing.  The big projects
that I'm
> >>>>>>> still working on:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> blur-core
> >>>>>>> blur-mapreduce
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope to have them in a semi-functional state ready to
be
> committed
> >>>>>>> by some point tomorrow.  Just wanted to let everyone know
that
> these
> >>>>>>> changes that we have been discussing for a couple weeks
should find
> >>>>>>> it's way to master in the next day or so.  Unfortunately
with all
> the
> >>>>>>> version changes and the API changes this is going to be
a big bang
> >>>>>>> (which I don't like), but hopefully we won't have to go
through
> one of
> >>>>>>> there again for a long time (if ever).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Aaron
> >>>>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message