incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From rohit sharma <rohit0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Path to 0.2 - Progress report
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:32:07 GMT
+1 on this.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have not made as much progress as I had wanted this weekend.  I have
> decided to try and upgrade the existing code to Lucene 4.0 before
> trying to add the new API to the mix.  I really don't want to check in
> a bunch of broken code.  But if I did this might be a good opportunity
> for others to figure out how things work internally by jumping in and
> helping to port the old Lucene 3.6 code to 4.0.  I won't push any of
> my changes until we take a vote on this.  Also I will be working to
> get the code compiling again most of the day tomorrow.  Thanks.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am in the process on getting the code setup and ready for 0.2 on a
> > local branch.  The following version changes have been made in 0.2.
> >
> > Thrift went to 0.8.0
> > Lucene to 4.0.0
> > Hadoop to 1.0.3
> > ZooKeeper to 3.4.4
> >
> > Also the blur-util, blur-store, blur-thrift projects are cleaned up
> > and compiling with unit tests passing.  The big projects that I'm
> > still working on:
> >
> > blur-core
> > blur-mapreduce
> >
> > I hope to have them in a semi-functional state ready to be committed
> > by some point tomorrow.  Just wanted to let everyone know that these
> > changes that we have been discussing for a couple weeks should find
> > it's way to master in the next day or so.  Unfortunately with all the
> > version changes and the API changes this is going to be a big bang
> > (which I don't like), but hopefully we won't have to go through one of
> > there again for a long time (if ever).
> >
> > Aaron
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message