incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Path to 0.2 - Progress report
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:17:34 GMT
CompressedFieldDataDirectory will be brought back in the form of a extension to the appendingcodec
in lucene 4. It will fit more naturally there.  We should and a jira issue for it's implementation.


Aaron

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes CTR on the lucene-4.0.0 branch for committers and patches through
>> jira for contributors?  Does that makes sense?  This is all new to me.
>> :)
> 
> Sounds ok. Although I mainly deal with RTC so somewhat new to me as well.
> 
> Why was CompressedFieldDataDirectory removed? Is that coming back or
> some alternative in 4.0?
> 
> Patrick
> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Sounds good. Create a new lucene4 branch?
>>> 
>>> I'm not yet clear on the development approach. Re the discussion on
>>> the "question on commit process" thread. How will commits to this
>>> branch be handled? Through jiras? CTR so no reviews before the fact?
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Anyone else have an opinion on this?
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:32 AM, rohit sharma <rohit0286@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> +1 on this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have not made as much progress as I had wanted this weekend.  I
have
>>>>>> decided to try and upgrade the existing code to Lucene 4.0 before
>>>>>> trying to add the new API to the mix.  I really don't want to check
in
>>>>>> a bunch of broken code.  But if I did this might be a good opportunity
>>>>>> for others to figure out how things work internally by jumping in
and
>>>>>> helping to port the old Lucene 3.6 code to 4.0.  I won't push any
of
>>>>>> my changes until we take a vote on this.  Also I will be working
to
>>>>>> get the code compiling again most of the day tomorrow.  Thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> I am in the process on getting the code setup and ready for 0.2
on a
>>>>>>> local branch.  The following version changes have been made in
0.2.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thrift went to 0.8.0
>>>>>>> Lucene to 4.0.0
>>>>>>> Hadoop to 1.0.3
>>>>>>> ZooKeeper to 3.4.4
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also the blur-util, blur-store, blur-thrift projects are cleaned
up
>>>>>>> and compiling with unit tests passing.  The big projects that
I'm
>>>>>>> still working on:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> blur-core
>>>>>>> blur-mapreduce
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I hope to have them in a semi-functional state ready to be committed
>>>>>>> by some point tomorrow.  Just wanted to let everyone know that
these
>>>>>>> changes that we have been discussing for a couple weeks should
find
>>>>>>> it's way to master in the next day or so.  Unfortunately with
all the
>>>>>>> version changes and the API changes this is going to be a big
bang
>>>>>>> (which I don't like), but hopefully we won't have to go through
one of
>>>>>>> there again for a long time (if ever).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>> 

Mime
View raw message