incubator-blur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron McCurry <amccu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Blur Website
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:37:34 GMT
We are good to use the blur.io site.  I will work on getting the
source for the site.

Aaron

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I forgot to send an email, I just sent one to the appropriate people.
> I should hear something back in the next day, then we can go from
> there.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I will discuss with Near Infinity and report back on the existing web site.
>>
>> Hey Aaron, any luck figuring out if we can use the current web
>> content?  If not, I think we should work to scrape together something
>> for now.
>>
>> --tim
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Aaron McCurry <amccurry@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> I see that from the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html
>>>>> guide that the website needs to be maintained in the version control
>>>>> system.  We can start working on the site now, and once the git repo
>>>>> is setup we can make sure that's get is the source moving forward.  I
>>>>> will be happy to provide documentation and content for the web site
>>>>> plus migrate any existing content from github wiki and any other
>>>>> places it might exist.  But I have no web site designer skills what so
>>>>> ever, so I'm going to need help there.  Also we should discuss what
>>>>> needs to be done with the blur.io site currently owned by Near
>>>>> Infinity.
>>>>
>>>> Is Near Infinity giving us the content of the existing site?  The
>>>> domain name?  The current site looks good and would be enough content
>>>> for us to start to attract folks I reckon - gives people some content
>>>> to land on at least.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not familiar with how sites work with git (I'm an svn fan being
>>>> dragged kicking and screaming into a new git world:).  I'm clarifying,
>>>> but I *think* if we want to use the CMS we'll have to create a
>>>> separate repo for the doc sources.  Unless someone clarifies here,
>>>> I'll report back the answer I get from infra.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --tim

Mime
View raw message